
1. 中国联合重型燃气轮机技术有限公司,北京,100016
2. 上海发电设备成套设计研究院有限责任公司,上海,200240
Online First:10 March 2026,
Published:10 March 2026
移动端阅览
吴智泉,陈洪溪,张天博,石䶮,郝宁. 直燃超临界二氧化碳燃气轮机热力循环的建立与研究动力工程学报, 2026, 46(3): 40-52 https://doi.
org/10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2026.250654
吴智泉,陈洪溪,张天博,石䶮,郝宁. 直燃超临界二氧化碳燃气轮机热力循环的建立与研究动力工程学报, 2026, 46(3): 40-52 https://doi. DOI: 10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2026.250654.
org/10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2026.250654 DOI:
新型电力系统高质量发展对低碳、调节型支撑电源提出了迫切需求。利用超临界二氧化碳物性特征
构建了具有零碳发电和调节功能的直燃超临界二氧化碳燃气轮机(SCGT)热力循环
并研究了热力循环特性、性能优化策略及其与新能源耦合应用场景。结果表明:SCGT净电效率为55.62%
净比功为794.7 kW/kg
与加装碳捕集与封存(CCS)设备的燃气轮机联合循环相比
净电效率提高4.56百分点
与Allam循环相比
净比功提高141%;燃烧室、透平和回热器分别占系统损失的58.99%、17.57%和7.87%
是净电效率损失的主要来源;增加透平进口温度对提高系统净电效率最为有利
保持进口条件不变
优化透平背压可获得净电效率最佳值;SCGT耦合压缩储能后
储能效率达70%左右
储能容量达28.6%
具有低燃料成本、高功率密度、长时储能的优势
符合新型电力系统发展需求。
The high-quality development of new power systems has necessitated a significant supply of low-carbon and dispatchable power sources. According to the thermodynamic properties of supercritical carbon dioxide
a direct-fired supercritical carbon dioxide gas turbine (SCGT) thermal cycle was developed
enabling zero-carbon power generation and regulation functions. Thermodynamic cycle characteristics
performance optimization strategies and coupled application scenarios with new energy sources were investigated. Results show that SCGT achieves a net power generation efficiency of 55.62% and a specific output power of 794.7 kW/kg. Compared with gas turbine combined cycle equipped with carbon capture and storage (CCS) facility
SCGT shows an improvement of 4.56 percentage points in net power generation efficiency. Compared with Allam cycle
SCGT shows an improvement of 141% in specific output power. The combustor
turbine
and regenerator account for 58.99%
17.57%
and 7.87% of exergy loss in SCGT respectively
and constitute the primary sources of net power generation efficiency deficit. Increasing gas turbine inlet temperature proves most effective for improving power generation efficiency
and optimizing turbine backpressure enables the optimal power generation efficiency under constant inlet conditions. SCGT coupled with energy storage achieves an energy storage efficiency of around 70% and an energy storage capacity ratio of 28.6%. Owing to its advantages of low fuel cost
high power density and long-duration energy storage capability
SCGT technology is well-aligned with the development requirements of new power systems.
水电水利规划设计总院. 中国可再生能源发展报告2024年度[R]. 北京: 水电水利规划设计总院, 2025.
舒印彪, 汤涌, 张正陵, 等. 欧洲伊比利亚半岛电网"428"大停电事故分析及启示[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(17): 6603-6611.SHU Yinbiao, TANG Yong, ZHANG Zhengling, et al. Analysis and lessons of the April 28, 2025 blackout in the Iberian Peninsula power system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(17): 6603-6611.
李政, 李伟起, 张忠伟, 等. "双碳"目标下我国电力系统灵活性资源发展策略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2024, 26(4): 108-120.LI Zheng, LI Weiqi, ZHANG Zhongwei, et al. Development strategy of flexible resources in China's power system under the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2024, 26(4): 108-120.
王博, 杨德友, 蔡国伟. 高比例新能源接入下电力系统惯量相关问题研究综述[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44(8): 2998-3006.WANG Bo, YANG Deyou, CAI Guowei. Review of research on power system inertia related issues in the context of high penetration of renewable power generation[J]. Power System Technology, 2020, 44(8): 2998-3006.
王伟, 周少泽, 黄萌, 等. 构网型技术: 演进历程、功能定位与应用展望[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2025, 49(1): 1-13. WANG Wei, ZHOU Shaoze, HUANG Meng, et al. Grid-forming technologies: evolution history, function, and application prospects[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2025, 49(1): 1-13.
吴智泉, 贾纯超, 陈磊, 等. 新型电力系统中储能创新方向研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2021, 42(10): 444-451. WU Zhiquan, JIA Chunchao, CHEN Lei, et al. Research on innovative direction of energy storage in new power system construction[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2021, 42(10): 444-451.
李更丰, 孙少华, 别朝红, 等. 面向新型电力系统弹性提升的储能优化配置与灵活调度研究综述[J]. 高电压技术, 2023, 49(10): 4084-4095.LI Gengfeng, SUN Shaohua, BIE Zhaohong, et al. Review on optimal configuration and flexible scheduling research of energy storage for resilience improvement of new power system[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2023, 49(10): 4084-4095.
顾大钊, 李阳, 李根生, 等. 面向2040年我国碳中和重点领域工程科技发展战略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2024, 26(5): 80-90.GU Dazhao, LI Yang, LI Gensheng, et al. Development strategy of engineering science and technology in key fields of carbon neutrality in China toward 2040[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2024, 26(5): 80-90.
李俊彪, 王明华. 基于不同情景模式的燃煤掺氨发电技术的经济性分析[J]. 中国煤炭, 2022, 48(5): 54-59. LI Junbiao, WANG Minghua. Economic analysis of ammonia mixed coal-fired power generation technology based on different scenario modes[J]. China Coal, 2022, 48(5): 54-59.
张治忠, 陈继平, 谭学谦, 等. 天然气联合循环电厂燃烧后CO 2 捕集一体化技术经济评价[J ] . 南方能源建设, 2023, 10(2): 55-61.ZHANG Zhizhong, CHEN Jiping, TAN Xueqian, et al. Economic evaluation of post-combustion CO 2 capture integration technology in natural gas combined cycle power plant[J ] . Southern Energy Construction, 2023, 10(2): 55-61.
ZHU Mingjuan, LIU Yudong, WU Xiao, et al. Dynamic modeling and comprehensive analysis of direct air-cooling coal-fired power plant integrated with carbon capture for reliable, economic and flexible operation[J]. Energy, 2023, 263: 125490.
邓清华, 胡乐豪, 李军, 等. 超临界二氧化碳发电技术现状及挑战[J]. 热力透平, 2019, 48(3): 159-165. DENG Qinghua, HU Lehao, LI Jun, et al. State-of-art and challenge on technologies of supercritical carbon dioxide electric power generation[J]. Thermal Turbine, 2019, 48(3): 159-165.
SMITH C F, HALSEY W G, BROWN N W, et al. SSTAR: the US lead-cooled fast reactor (LFR)[J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2008, 376(3): 255-259.
NGUYEN T D C, CHOE J, EBIWONJUMI B, et al. Core design of long-cycle small modular lead-cooled fast reactor[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43(1): 254-273.
韩万龙, 丰镇平, 王月明, 等. 超临界二氧化碳高压涡轮气动设计及性能[J ] . 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2018, 50(7): 192-198.HAN Wanlong, FENG Zhenping, WANG Yueming, et al. Aerodynamic design and performance of SCO 2 high pressure turbines[J ] . Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018, 50(7): 192-198.
黄彦平, 刘旻昀, 卓文彬, 等. 超临界二氧化碳核能动力系统的兴起和发展[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2023, 57(9): 1665-1680.HUANG Yanping, LIU Minyun, ZHUO Wenbin, et al. Initiation and development of supercritical carbon dioxide nuclear energy and power system[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2023, 57(9): 1665-1680.
WANG Xurong, DAI Yiping. Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO 2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO 2 cycle waste heat recovery: a comparative study[J ] . Applied Energy, 2016, 170: 193-207.
ZHU Hanhui, WANG Kun, HE Yaling. Thermodynamic analysis and comparison for different direct-heated supercritical CO 2 Brayton cycles integrated into a solar thermal power tower system[J ] . Energy, 2017, 140: 144-157.
XU Jinliang, SUN Enhui, LI Mingjia, et al. Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant[J]. Energy, 2018, 157: 227-246.
王智, 吴雨筱, 韩旭, 等. 超临界二氧化碳组合型干气密封性能分析[J]. 动力工程学报, 2023, 43(9): 1143-1150, 1189.WANG Zhi, WUYuxiao, HAN Xu, et al. Performance analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide combined dry gas seal[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2023, 43(9): 1143-1150, 1189.
ZHAO Chenru, LIU Qianfeng, ZHANG Zhen, et al. Investigation of buoyancy-enhanced heat transfer of supercritical CO 2 in upward and downward tube flows[J ] . The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2018, 138: 154-166.
周妙琴, 张靖煊, 黄伟光. 超临界二氧化碳压缩机进口干度与气动性能关联性分析[J]. 动力工程学报, 2022, 42(12): 1265-1271.ZHOU Miaoqin, ZHANG Jingxuan, HUANG Weiguang. Correlation analysis of inlet dryness and aerodynamic performance of supercritical carbon dioxide compressor[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2022, 42(12): 1265-1271.
侯胜亚, 薛松松, 杨其国. 核反应堆超临界二氧化碳再压缩循环优化研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2024, 44(6): 984-990.HOU Shengya, XUE Songsong, YANG Qiguo. Optimization of supercritical carbon dioxide recompres-sion cycle in nuclear reactor[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2024, 44(6): 984-990.
ALLAM R J, PALMER M R, BROWN JR G W, et al. High efficiency and low cost of electricity generation from fossil fuels while eliminating atmospheric emissions, including carbon dioxide[J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 1135-1149.
SCACCABAROZZI R, GATTI M, MARTELLI E. Thermodynamic analysis and numerical optimization of the NET Power oxy-combustion cycle[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 178: 505-526.
REALE F. The Allam cycle: a review of numerical modeling approaches[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(22): 7678.
李红, 白雨鑫, 何青. 压缩二氧化碳储能系统膨胀机研究进展[J]. 热力发电, 2024, 53(2): 17-26.LI Hong, BAI Yuxin, HE Qing. Research progress of expander for compressed carbon dioxide energy storage system[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2024, 53(2): 17-26.
EL-MASRI M A. On thermodynamics of gas-turbine cycles: part 2—a model for expansion in cooled turbines[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1986, 108(1): 151-159.
WARDELL R J, RICHARDSON J, OTTO M, et al. An experimental investigation of heat transfer for supercritical carbon dioxide cooling in a staggered pin fin array[C] //Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2023: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. Boston, USA: ASME, 2023: GT2023-103263.
赵永明. 整体煤气化超临界二氧化碳动力循环的热力学研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院工程热物理研究所), 2018.
吴智泉, 王际辉, 白宁. 闭式布雷顿循环热泵储电系统的分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(3): 336-343. WU Zhiquan, WANG Jihui, BAI Ning. Exergy analysis for pumped thermal electricity storage system based on closed Brayton cycle[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2023, 44(3): 336-343.
0
Views
3
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621