Performance Comparison of Rankine-Carnot Batteries with Different Energy Storage Methods

WANG Jingkun; CAI Kun; XIA Rui; WANG Jun

doi:10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2025.250184

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Performance Comparison of Rankine-Carnot Batteries with Different Energy Storage Methods

更新时间：2026-10-10

- Performance Comparison of Rankine-Carnot Batteries with Different Energy Storage Methods
- Chinese Journal of Power Engineering Vol. 45, Issue 10, Pages: 1609-1614(2025)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司,浙江,杭州,311122
  2. 东南大学机械工程学院,江苏,南京,210024
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2025.250184
  CLC：
- Online First：21 April 2025，
  
  Published：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王靖坤,蔡锟,夏睿,王军. 不同储能方式的朗肯卡诺电池性能对比动力工程学报, 2025, 45(10): 1609-1614 https://doi.

org/10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2025.250184
王靖坤,蔡锟,夏睿,王军. 不同储能方式的朗肯卡诺电池性能对比动力工程学报, 2025, 45(10): 1609-1614 https://doi. DOI： 10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2025.250184.

org/10.19805/j.cnki.jcspe.2025.250184 DOI：

摘要

为对比不同储能方式朗肯卡诺电池的性能差异

分别建立了储热朗肯卡诺电池与储冷朗肯卡诺电池的热力学模型

对比分析了相同参数条件下2种系统的能量效率与效率。能量分析结果表明:不同储能方式朗肯卡诺电池的电能往返效率均由充电循环效率与放电循环效率共同决定

储热朗肯卡诺电池的电能往返效率随着储热温度升高10 K而降低17.99%

随着环境温度升高10 K而降低12.06%;储冷朗肯卡诺电池的电能往返效率随着储冷温度升高10 K而提高15.82%

随着环境温度升高10 K而降低22.69%。分析结果表明:储热朗肯卡诺电池的效率随着储热温度升高10 K而降低2.62%

随着环境温度升高10 K而降低4.90%;储冷朗肯卡诺电池的效率随着储冷温度升高10 K而提高1.91%

随着环境温度升高10 K而降低7.82%。参数敏感性分析结果表明:在相同循环温差条件下

储热朗肯卡诺电池的能量评价指标与评价指标均高于储冷朗肯卡诺电池

且与放电循环相比

充电循环的性能参数对参数条件变化的敏感性更高。

Abstract

To compare the performances of Rankine-Carnot batteries with different energy storage methods

thermodynamic models of the heat storage Rankine-Carnot battery and cold storage Rankine-Carnot battery were developed

respectively. The energy efficiency and exergy efficiency of the two systems under the same parameter conditions were compared and analyzed. The results of energy analysis show that: the round-trip electrical efficiency of Rankine-Carnot batteries with different energy storage methods is jointly determined by the charging cycle efficiency and discharging cycle efficiency. For the heat storage Rankine-Carnot battery

its round-trip electrical efficiency decreases by 17.99% as the heat storage temperature increases by 10 K

and decreases by 12.06% as the ambient temperature increases by 10 K. For the cold storage Rankine-Carnot battery

its round-trip electrical efficiency increases by 15.82% as the cold storage temperature increases by 10 K

and decreases by 22.69% as the ambient temperature increases by 10 K. The results of exergy analysis show that: the exergy efficiency of the heat storage Rankine-Carnot battery decreases by 2.62% as the heat storage temperature increases by 10 K

and decreases by 4.90% as the ambient temperature increases by 10 K. The exergy efficiency of the cold storage Rankine-Carnot battery increases by 1.91% as the cold storage temperature increases by 10 K

and decreases by 7.82% as the ambient temperature increases by 10 K. The results of parameter sensitivity analysis show that under the same cycle temperature difference

both the energy evaluation indicators and exergy evaluation indicators of the heat storage Rankine-Carnot battery are higher than those of the cold storage Rankine-Carnot battery. Moreover

compared with the discharging cycle

the performance parameters of the charging cycle are more sensitive to changes in parameter conditions.

关键词

Keywords

references

康重庆, 姚良忠. 高比例可再生能源电力系统的关键科学问题与理论研究框架[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2017, 41(9): 2-11. KANG Chongqing, YAO Liangzhong. Key scientific issues and theoretical research framework for power systems with high proportion of renewable energy[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017, 41(9): 2-11.

谢昂均, 杨正军, 徐钢, 等. 我国能源行业实现碳中和的产业链情景分析[J]. 动力工程学报, 2024, 44(11): 1733-1740, 1749. XIE Angjun, YANG Zhengjun, XU Gang, et al. Scenario analysis of the industrial chain for achieving carbon neutrality in China's energy industry[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2024, 44(11): 1733-1740, 1749.

葛丽超, 张怡. 考虑调频可靠性的风储系统多目标优化策略[J]. 热能动力工程, 2024, 39(2): 154-161. GE Lichao, ZHANG Yi. Multi-objective optimization strategy of wind storage system considering frequency modulation reliability[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2024, 39(2): 154-161.

安旭刚, 何青, 张千旭. 热泵储电系统多物理域建模与动态仿真研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2024, 44(10): 1592-1599. AN Xugang, HE Qing, ZHANG Qianxu. Research on multi-physics domain modeling and dynamic simulation of pumped thermal electricity storage system[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2024, 44(10): 1592-1599.

ZAMENGO M, YOSHIDA K, MORIKAWA J. Numerical evaluation of a Carnot battery system comprising a chemical heat storage/pump and a Brayton cycle[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2021, 41: 102955.

FRATE G F, FERRARI L, DESIDERI U. Rankine Carnot batteries with the integration of thermal energy sources: a review[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(18): 4766.

HASSAN A H, O'DONOGHUE L, SANCHEZ-CANALES V, et al. Thermodynamic analysis of high-temperature pumped thermal energy storage systems: refrigerant selection, performance and limitations[J]. Energy Reports, 2020, 6: 147-159.

BELLOS E, TZIVANIDIS C, SAID Z. Investigation and optimization of a solar-assisted pumped thermal energy storage system with flat plate collectors[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 237: 114137.

IQBAL Q, FANG Song, ZHAO Yao, et al. Thermo-economic assessment of sub-ambient temperature pumped-thermal electricity storage integrated with external heat sources[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 285: 116987.

XIA Rui, WANG Zhe, CAO Menglong, et al. Comprehensive performance analysis of cold storage Rankine Carnot batteries: energy, exergy, economic, and environmental perspectives[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 293: 117485.

WANG Zhe, XIA Rui, JIANG Yuemao, et al. Evaluation and optimization of an engine waste heat assisted Carnot battery system for ocean-going vessels during harbor stays[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 73: 108866.

JIANG Yuemao, MA Yue, HAN Fenghui, et al. Assessment and optimization of a novel waste heat stepped utilization system integrating partial heating sCO 2 cycle and ejector refrigeration cycle using zeotropic mixtures for gas turbine[J ] . Energy, 2023, 265: 126326.

FAN Ruoxuan, XI Huan. Energy, exergy, economic (3E) analysis, optimization and comparison of different Carnot battery systems for energy storage[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 252: 115037.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Establishment and Research of Direct-fired Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Gas Turbine Cycle

Operation Optimization of Combined Heat and Power Units Considering Dynamic Characteristics of Heating Network

Research on Optimal Scheduling Method for Source-Grid- Load-Storage Systems Considering Electro-Thermal Load Demands in Industrial Parks

Potential and Role of Seasonal Energy Storage in the Transition of Power and Heating Sectors—a Case Study

A Comparative Study of the Thermodynamic Performance of Carbon Dioxide Pumped Thermal Energy Storage Systems

Related Author

WU Zhiquan

CHEN Hongxi

ZHANG Tianbo

SHI Yan

HAO Ning

LI Zheng

LIU Pei

SHA Yutong

Related Institution

Shanghai Power Equipment Research Institute Co., Ltd.

China United Gas Turbine Technology Co., Ltd.

State Key Laboratory of Power System Operation and Control, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University

Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Processing Co., Ltd.

State Key Laboratory of Control and Simulation of Power Systems and Generation Equipments, Tsinghua University

AI问答

⁰