考虑流-固耦合的山西大宁盐穴二氧化碳地质封存密闭性与稳定性模拟研究

崔晓松; 董留清; 房斌斌; 原文涛; 程丽媛; 王姣霞; 杨美萍; 耿杰

doi:10.19666/j.rlfd.202506118

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

考虑流-固耦合的山西大宁盐穴二氧化碳地质封存密闭性与稳定性模拟研究

更新时间：2026-06-12

- 考虑流-固耦合的山西大宁盐穴二氧化碳地质封存密闭性与稳定性模拟研究
- Thermal Power Generation Vol. 55, Issue 4, Pages: 72-81(2026)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 山西省煤炭地质一四八勘查院有限公司
  2. 山西省二氧化碳地质封存技术创新中心
  3. 东北大学资源与土木工程学院
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.19666/j.rlfd.202506118
  CLC： X701;P642
- Published：2026
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
[1]崔晓松,董留清,房斌斌,等.考虑流-固耦合的山西大宁盐穴二氧化碳地质封存密闭性与稳定性模拟研究[J].热力发电,2026,55(04):72-81.
[1]崔晓松,董留清,房斌斌,等.考虑流-固耦合的山西大宁盐穴二氧化碳地质封存密闭性与稳定性模拟研究[J].热力发电,2026,55(04):72-81. DOI： 10.19666/j.rlfd.202506118.

DOI：10.19666/j.rlfd.202506118.

摘要

【目的】现代工业生产排放了大量的CO

，为缓解CO

造成的温室效应，利用盐穴对其进行捕获封存。【方法】以山西省大宁县盐岩为潜在储层，基于地质勘察资料建立大宁县盐岩CO

封存试验区地质模型，在流-固耦合条件下，以CO

孔隙压力表示CO

的泄漏范围并作为密封性指标，以腔体顶部竖向位移和竖向应力作为稳定性指标，开展盐穴储气库在不同CO

封存压力、不同矿柱间距工况下的长期密闭性与稳定性研究。【结果】气体封存压力越大，其渗漏范围越大，储气库围岩的竖向位移越大，围岩塑性区范围越小，在封存压力分别为17、23、27、33 MPa下的最终时刻，气体的泄漏范围分别为47、67、73、84 m，腔体顶部的竖向位移分别为–11.5、12.9、28.7、52.2 mm，围岩塑性区范围分别为22、11.8、8、4 m；矿柱间距越大，围岩的竖向位移和垂直应力越小，间距对气体的渗漏范围和塑性区影响不大，在矿柱间距为1.0、1.5、2.0、3.0倍时竖向位移分别为31.7、29.1、28.2、27.3 mm。【结论】气体封存压力增高不利于储气库的密闭性，压力降低则不利于储气库的稳定性；矿柱间距增加有利于储气库的密闭性与稳定性，但影响较小。该研究为山西大宁盐穴封存CO

提供了理论基础。

Abstract

[Objective

]

Modern industrial production emits vast quantities of CO

and to mitigate the greenhouse effect caused by CO

geological sequestration of CO

is imperative. Consequently

the utilization of salt caverns for CO

capture and storage is being considered. [Methods

]

This study uses the salt rock formation in Daning County

Shanxi Province as a potential reservoir. Based on geological survey data

a geological model is established for the Daning County salt rock CO

storage pilot area. Under fluid-solid couplin

g conditions

leakage extent is represented by CO

pore pressure as a sealing indicator

while vertical displacement at the top of the salt cavern reservoir and vertical stress serve as stability indicators. Long-term sealing integrity and stability studies are conducted for the salt cavern reservoir under varying CO

storage pressures and different pillar spacing conditions. [Results

]

As the gas storage pressure increases

the leakage range of the gas expands

the vertical displacement of the reservoir rock increases

and the range of the plastic zone in the rock decreases. At the final state with storage pressures of 17

27 and 33 MPa

the leakage ranges of the gas are 47

73 and 84 m

the vertical displacement at the top of the cavity is –11.5

12.9

28.7 and 52.2 mm

and the range of the rock mass plastic zone is 22

11.8

8 and 4 m

respectively. As the spacing between mine pillars increases

the vertical displacement and vertical stress of the surrounding rock decrease. The spacing has little effect on the gas leakage range and plastic zone. When the spacing between mine pillars is 1.0

1.5

2.0 and 3.0 times the original spacing

the gas leakage range remains between 60 m and 63 m

and the vertical displacement at the cavity top is 31.7

29.1

28.2 and 27.3 mm

respectively. The plastic zone extent within the gas storage reservoir is broadly consistent

ranging between 9 m and 10 m

respectively. [Conclusion

]

Excessively high pressure in a storage reservoir compromises its sealing integrity

while excessively low pressure undermines its stability. A greater spacing between pillars within the reservoir enhances both sealing integrity and stability

but the impact is relatively minor. This study provides a theoretical foundation for CO

storage in the Daning Salt Cavern in Shanxi Province.

关键词

Keywords

references

丁国生,丁一宸,李洋,等.碳中和战略下的中国地下储气库发展前景[J].油气储运, 2022, 41(1):1-9.DING Guosheng, DING Yichen, LI Yang, et al. Prospects of underground gas storage in China under the strategy of carbon neutrality[J]. Oil&Gas Storage and Transportation, 2022, 41(1):1-9.

《中国二氧化碳捕集利用与封存(CCUS)年度报告(2023)》发布[J].聚氯乙烯, 2023, 51(8):42.China Carbon Dioxide Capture Utilisation and Storage(CCUS)Annual Report(2023)Released[J]. Polyvinyl Chloride, 2023, 51(8):42.

桑树勋,袁亮,刘世奇,等.碳中和地质技术及其煤炭低碳化应用前瞻[J].煤炭学报, 2022, 47(4):1430-1451.SANG Shuxun, YUAN Liang, LIU Shiqi, et al.Geological technology for carbon neutrality and its application prospect for low carbon coal exploitation and utilization[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(4):1430-1451.

方杰,雷宏武,时俊杰,等. CO2地质封存与利用技术发展态势与展望[J].热力发电, 2025, 54(6):157-167.FANG Jie, LEI Hongwu, SHI Junjie, et al. Research on CO2 geological storage and utilization:progress and prospects[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2025, 54(6):157-167.

徐高,谢芳毅,曹振瑞,等.压缩空气储能盐穴储气库技术及其智能建造工艺技术研究[J].热力发电, 2024,53(9):48-59.XU Gao, XIE Fangyi, CAO Zhenrui, et al. Research on salt cavern gas storage of compressed air energy storage and its intelligent construction process[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2024, 53(9):48-59.

MWAKIPUNDA G C, MGIMBA M M, NGATA M R, et al. Recent advances on carbon dioxide sequestration potentiality in salt caverns:a review[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2024, 133:104109.

谢凌志,周宏伟,谢和平.盐岩CO2处置相关研究进展[J].岩土力学, 2009, 30(11):3324-3330.XIE Lingzhi, ZHOU Hongwei, XIE Heping. Research advance of CO2 storage in rock salt caverns[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(11):3324-3330.

郑雅丽,完颜祺琪,邱小松,等.盐穴地下储气库选址与评价新技术[J].天然气工业, 2019, 39(6):123-130.ZHENG Yali, WANYAN Qiqi, QIU Xiaosong, et al. New technologies for site selection and evaluation of saltcavern underground gas storages[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2019, 39(6):123-130.

HOLLOWAY S. Underground sequestration of carbon dioxide:a viable greenhouse gas mitigation option[J].Energy, 2005, 30(11/12):2318-2333.

梁卫国,赵阳升.盐岩溶腔二氧化碳地质储存研究[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2007(增刊2):1545-1550.LIANG Weiguo, ZHAO Yangsheng. Investigation on carbon dioxide geologic sequestration in salt caverns[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2007(Suppl.2):1545-1550.

LORING J S, CHEN J, BENEZETH P, et al. Evidence for carbonate surface complexation during forsterite carbonation in wet supercritical carbon dioxide[J].Langmuir, 2015, 31(27):7533-7543.

GUNTER W D, BACHU S, LAW D H S, et al. Technical and economic feasibility of CO2 disposal in aquifers within the Alberta Sedimentary Basin, Canada[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 1996, 37(6/8):1135-1142.

杨春和,王同涛.深地储能研究进展[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(9):1729-1759.YANG Chunhe, WANG Tongtao. Advance in deep underground energy storage[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(9):1729-1759.

陈剑文,杨春和,郭印同.基于盐岩压缩-扩容边界理论的盐岩储气库密闭性分析研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(增刊2):3302-3308.CHEN Jianwen, YANG Chunhe, GUO Yintong. Study of sealability of cavern for natural gas storage in deep salt formation based on compaction-dilatancy boundary of salt[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(Suppl.2):3302-3308.

MOU J, SHANG H, JI W, et al. Feasibility analysis of compressed air energy storage in salt caverns in the Yunying Area[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(20):7171.

齐得山,李淑平,王元刚.金坛盐穴储气库腔体偏溶特征分析[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,41(2):75-83.QI Deshan, LI Shuping, WANG Yuangang. Characteristics of cavity differential dissolution of Jintan salt cave gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science&Technology Edition), 2019, 41(2):75-83.

陈祥胜,李银平,施锡林,等.地下盐穴储气库泄漏原因及防治措施研究[J].岩土力学, 2019, 40(增刊1):367-373.CHEN Xiangsheng, LI Yinping, SHI Xilin, et al. Analysis of leakage risks and prevention measures of underground salt cavern gas storage[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019,40(Suppl.1):367-373.

WHITE C M, STRAZISAR B R, GRANITE E J, et al.Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations:Coalbeds and deep saline aquifers[J]. Journal of the Air&Waste Management Association, 2003, 53(6):645-715.

王同涛,闫相祯,杨恒林,等.多夹层盐穴储气库群间矿柱稳定性研究[J].煤炭学报, 2011, 36(5):790-795.WANG Tongtao, YAN Xiangzhen, YANG Henglin, et al.Stability analysis of pillars between bedded salt cavern gas storages[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2011, 36(5):790-795.

梁光川,王梦秋,彭星煜,等.盐穴地下储气库溶腔形态变化数值模拟[J].天然气工业, 2014, 34(7):88-92.LIANG Guangchuan, WANG Mengqiu, PENG Xingyu, et al. Numerical simulation of the creep deformation of underground salt cavern gas storage[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(7):88-92.

尹雪英,杨春和,陈剑文.金坛盐矿老腔储气库长期稳定性分析数值模拟[J].岩土力学, 2006(6):869-874.YIN Xueying, YANG Chunhe, CHEN Jianwen, et al.Numerical simulation research on long-term stability of gas storage in Jintan Salt Mine[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006(6):869-874.

刘冰冰,武志德,丁国生,等.盐穴储气库群地表沉降及变形预测分析[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(增刊1):418-425.LIU Bingbing, WU Zhide, DING Guosheng, et al.Prediction analysis of surface subsidence and deformation of salt cavern gas storage group[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2022, 18(Suppl.1):418-425.

屈丹安,杨春和,任松.金坛盐穴地下储气库地表沉降预测研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(增刊1):2705-2711.QU Dan’an, YANG Chunhe, REN Song. Study and prediction of surface subsidence of salt rock caves used for gas storages in Jintan Salt Mine[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(Suppl.1):2705-2711.

王志荣,贺平,石茜茜,等.平顶山地下盐穴储气库地表沉降机理数值模拟[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2018,14(4):1105-1113.WANG Zhirong, HE Ping, SHI Xixi, et al. Numerical simulation on mechanism of surface subsidence caused by gas storage of salt cavern in Pingdingshan[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2018,14(4):1105-1113.

王贵君,刘朝鹏,介少龙,等.考虑流-固耦合的天然气盐岩储气库渗流特性研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2016, 12(增刊2):470-474.WANG Guijun, LIU Zhaopeng, JIE Shaolong, et al. Study on seepage characteristics of natural gas reservoir in salt rock considering fluid-solid coupling[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2016,12(Suppl.2):470-474.

王国华,张学林,李智,等.压缩空气储能盐穴储气库注采全过程热力学特性分析[J].可再生能源, 2019,37(4):618-624.WANG Guohua, ZHANG Xuelin, LI Zhi, et al.Thermodynamics analysis of salt cavern for compressed air energy storage system[J]. Renewable Energy Resources, 2019, 37(4):618-624.

赵瀚辰,韩伟,姚明宇,等.熔盐储热耦合压缩空气储能系统经济性分析[J].热力发电, 2024, 53(8):1-8.ZHAO Hanchen, HAN Wei, YAO Mingyu, et al.Economic analysis of a compressed air energy storage system coupled with molten salt thermal storage system[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2024, 53(8):1-8.

梁卫国,张倍宁,黎力,等.注能(以CO2为例)改性驱替开采CH4理论与实验研究[J].煤炭学报, 2018,43(10):2839-2847.LIANG Weiguo, ZHANG Beining, LI Li, et al. Theory and experimental study of CBM recovery driven by energy boosting[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018,43(10):2839-2847.

KAMALI-ASL A, ZOBACK M D, KOHLI A H. Effects of supercritical CO2 on matrix permeability of unconventional formations[J]. Energies, 2021, 14(4):1101.

张胜利,梁卫国,肖宁,等.考虑温度的盐岩分数阶黏弹塑性蠕变损伤模型[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2022,41(增刊2):3198-3209.ZHANG Shengli, LIANG Weiguo, XIAO Ning, et al. A fractional viscoelastic-plastic creep damage model for salt rock considering temperature effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(Suppl.2):3198-3209.

张胜利,徐素国,肖宁,等.温度-应力耦合作用下深部盐岩蠕变损伤模型[J].煤炭学报, 2024, 49(8):3425-3438.ZHANG Shengli, XU Suguo, XIAO Ning, et al. Creep damage model for deep salt rock under temperature and stress coupling effect[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2024, 49(8):3425-3438.

杨一奇,何忱,姚池,等.超临界CO2在高温裂隙岩体中的热交换研究[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2021,17(6):1713-1722.YANG Yiqi, HE Chen, YAO Chi, et al. Study on the heat exchange of supercritical CO2 in high temperature fractured rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2021, 17(6):1713-1722.

中华人民共和国国家能源局.盐穴地下储气库安全技术规程:SY/T 7689—2023[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2023:1.National Energy Administration of China. Technical requirements for cavern design of storage in salt caverns:SY/T 7689—2023[S]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2023:1.

陈祥胜,熊天恺,李银平,等.层状盐岩地下储气库运行压力设定方法研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2024,43(5):1139-1151.CHEN Xiangsheng, XIONG Tiankai, LI Yinping, et al.Setting method for operating pressure of underground gas storage bedded salt cavern[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 43(5):1139-1151.

陈锋,张青庆,姚威,等.含泥盐岩的扩容特性与剪胀角模型[J].岩土力学, 2018, 39(增刊2):195-201.CHEN Feng, ZHANG Qingqing, YAO Wei, et al. Dilation behavior and dilation angle model of salt rock with mudstone[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018,39(Suppl.2):195-201.

宗师,刘世奇,徐辉,等.苏北盆地层状盐穴储气库CO2封存数值模拟研究[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2023,51(3):27-36.ZONG Shi, LIU Shiqi, XU Hui, et al. Numerical simulation of CO2 storage in bedded salt rock storage cavern in Subei Basin[J]. Coal Geology&Exploration,2023, 51(3):27-36.

PAVAN T N V, GOVINDARAJAN S K. Numerical investigations on performance of sc-CO2 sequestration associated with the evolution of porosity and permeability in low permeable saline aquifers[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2023, 225:211681.

程远方,程林林,黎慧,等.不同渗透性储层Biot系数测试方法研究及其影响因素分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(增刊2):3998-4004.CHENG Yuanfang, CHENG Linlin, LI Hui, et al.Research on testing methods of Biot coefficient in reservoir with different permeability and its influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(Suppl.2):3998-4004.

中华人民共和国国家能源局.盐穴地下储气库安全技术规程:SY 6806—2010[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2011:1.National Energy Administration of China. Safety rules of salt cavern underground gas storage:SY 6806—2010[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2011:1.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

大型风电机组多点特征风速选择及估计

基于融合全局残差Mamba的短期电价预测方法研究

风力发电机组混塔结构安全性研究

基于一种相变储热固态储氢热电联产系统的经济性分析

基于神经网络和遗传算法的气膜冷却孔结构优化

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

AI问答

⁰