JIA Bao-xin, LI Feng, ZHOU Lin-li, et al. Joint arrival-time picking method of microseismic P-wave
and S-wave based on time-frequency analysis[J]. 2021, 42(5): 1253-1265.
DOI:
JIA Bao-xin, LI Feng, ZHOU Lin-li, et al. Joint arrival-time picking method of microseismic P-wave
and S-wave based on time-frequency analysis[J]. 2021, 42(5): 1253-1265.DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1439.
Joint arrival-time picking method of microseismic P-wave
and S-wave based on time-frequency analysis
Accurate acquisition of arrival time of microseismic signals is an important prerequisite for focal location
and the accurate acquisition of arrival time of P-wave and S-wave of microseismic signals has important theoretical significance. Based on the principles of time-frequency analysis and the arrival-time picking
the time-frequency analysis-downhill comparison method is proposed. According to the time-frequency analysis principle of this method
the position and rule of background noise
the frequency
amplitude and energy of microseismic signals before and after the initial arrival of P-wave and S-wave and smooth waveforms that facilitate the comparison of iterative averages can be obtained through spectrogram
power density spectrum and two successive FIR band-pass filters. By setting the mathematical expectation of the full wavelet amplitude as the threshold and iteratively comparing wavelet amplitudes of microseismic signals based on three relationships of power
arrival order and waveform overlap of P-wave and S-wave
the precise arrival time of P-wave and the arrival time of S-wave peak value are obtained. The advantages of this method over the improved STA/LTA method are compared by model tests and have been verified in an engineering example. The results show that: compared with the improved STA/LTA method
this proposed method can simultaneously pick up the precise arrival time of P-wave and the arrival time of S-wave peak value
while the latter can only pick up the accurate arrival time of P-wave. The average time difference and standard deviation of the former are 6.18 ‰ and 3.98 ‰ of the latter
respectively. Additionally
the average calculation time and standard deviation of the former are 43.99% and 10.54% of the latter
respectively. The failure ratio of the former is 0 while that of the latter is 15.63%.
Time-frequency and attenuation analysis of shallow tunnel high-speed railway vibration signal based on high-order local maximum synchrosqueezing transform
Time-frequency analysis on amplification of seismic ground motion
Comparative theoretical and experimental analysis of rock breaking by tunnel boring machine disc cutters
Experimental study on shear characteristics of mudstone under combined action of stress-dry-wet cycles