Application of effective stress method and effective consolidation
 stress method for strength calculation in preloading ground

TU Yuan; WANG Kui-hua; ZHOU Jian; HU An-feng

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0443

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Application of effective stress method and effective consolidation stress method for strength calculation in preloading ground

更新时间：2026-06-25

- Application of effective stress method and effective consolidation stress method for strength calculation in preloading ground
- Vol. 41, Issue 2, Pages: 645-654(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 浙江大学滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心,浙江,杭州,310058
  2. 浙江大学浙江省城市地下空间开发工程技术研究中心,浙江,杭州,310058
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0443
  CLC： TU472.33
- Online First：12 February 2020，
  
  Published：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
TU Yuan, WANG Kui-hua, ZHOU Jian, et al. Application of effective stress method and effective consolidation stress method for strength calculation in preloading ground[J]. 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
DOI：

TU Yuan, WANG Kui-hua, ZHOU Jian, et al. Application of effective stress method and effective consolidation stress method for strength calculation in preloading ground[J]. 2020, 41(2): 645-654. DOI： 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0443.

摘要

计算预压地基抗剪强度的现行规范公式是基于土体不等向固结过程推导而来的，理论上并不适用于含有等向固结过程的预压地基。为此，分析现有强度增长理论（有效应力法和有效固结压力法）的计算原理，基于有效固结压力法并结合不同类型预压土体的固结过程，推导了计算预压地基抗剪强度的新公式；从理论分析的角度讨论了规范公式和新公式应用于真空预压和联合预压时的计算结果，最后结合某联合预压地基处理工程检验了规范公式和新公式的适用性，并对比分析了计算强度与实测强度的差异。结果表明：有效固结压力法可以考虑土体在等向固结和不等向固结中强度增长的差异，规范公式理论上仅适用于堆载预压地基的强度计算；规范公式对真空预压和联合预压地基强度的理论计算值均小于所提出的新公式，两者相对误差的大小仅与土体内摩擦角有关，且随的增大而增大；在某联合预压地基处理工程中，新公式的强度预测值相较于规范公式与实测值更为接近，能更加准确地反映地基土强度增长规律。根据不同预压类型来选取相应的强度计算公式，这对于实际工程计算有一定的参考意义。

Abstract

The standard formula for calculating the soil shear strength of the preloading ground under anisotropic consolidation is not applicable to isotropic consolidation process. In this paper

a new formula was proposed to calculate the soil shear strength of the preloading ground under isotropic consolidation process. This new formula was derived by analyzing the calculation principle of the two existing fundamental methods

which are effective stress method (ESM) and effective consolidation stress method (ECSM)

respectively. Then the results that calculated by the new formula and the standard formula applied to vacuum preloading and vacuum combined surcharge preloading were theoretically discussed and compared. Finally

the applicability of the new formula and the standard formula were tested by the practical engineering

and the difference between the calculated strength and the measured strength were also analyzed. The results show that the ECSM can be applied to the preloading ground under both the isotropic consolidation and the anisotropic consolidation

while standard formula is only applicable to surcharge preloading ground theoretically. The values of soil shear strength of the vacuum preloading and vacuum combined surcharge preloading that calculated by the standard formula are smaller than those calculated by the new formula. The relative difference of the two calculation values only relates to the friction angle and increases as the friction angle increases. In the vacuum combined surcharge preloading treatment project

the shear strength prediction values by the new formulas are closer to the measured values than those by the standard formulas. The result of this study can be potentially helpful for calculating different kinds of preloading grounds in practice.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

245

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法

Shear strength and volume change behavior of clay-rich soil at high suctions

Direct shear tests and PFC2D numerical simulation of colluvial mixture

Experimental study of shear failure characteristics of spread foundations

Study of test methods of saturated soil shear strength considering effects of stress history

Related Author

LIU Ji-fu

XU Xiao

ZHAO Cheng-gang

XUE Ya-dong

LIU Zhong-qiang

WU Jian

LI Rong-nian

TENG Yan-jing

Related Institution

Guangdong Communication Planning & Design Institute Group Co., Ltd.,, Gungdong

Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University

College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guilin University of Technology

Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Education Ministry, Tongji University

Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongii University

AI问答

⁰