Simulation analysis of dynamic process of debris flow based 
on different entrainment models

WU Feng-yuan; FAN Yun-yun; CHEN Jian-ping; LI Jun

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0785

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Simulation analysis of dynamic process of debris flow based on different entrainment models

更新时间：2026-06-25

- Simulation analysis of dynamic process of debris flow based on different entrainment models
- Vol. 40, Issue 8, Pages: 3236-3246(2019)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 沈阳建筑大学土木工程学院,辽宁,沈阳,110168
  2. 吉林大学建设工程学院,吉林,长春,130012
  3. 东北大学资源与土木工程学院,辽宁,沈阳,110819
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0785
  CLC： P642.23
- Online First：26 August 2019，
  
  Published：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
WU Feng-yuan, FAN Yun-yun, CHEN Jian-ping, et al. Simulation analysis of dynamic process of debris flow based on different entrainment models[J]. 2019, 40(8): 3236-3246.
DOI：

WU Feng-yuan, FAN Yun-yun, CHEN Jian-ping, et al. Simulation analysis of dynamic process of debris flow based on different entrainment models[J]. 2019, 40(8): 3236-3246. DOI： 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0785.

摘要

为实现高速崩滑碎屑流沿程侵蚀动力过程的模拟分析，采用连续理论方法对Nomash River碎屑流动力过程进行了数值模拟。其中，在连续理论模型中采用3种不同侵蚀速率模型，并采用HLLC近似Riemann解对有限体积数值离散控制体单元的界面通量进行了计算求解。致灾范围及运动时间的计算结果均与实际灾害情况吻合良好，验证了计算模拟的正确有效性，并对最终堆积深度、运动速度和侵蚀区域侵蚀深度进行了分析讨论。结果显示：采用McDougall侵蚀模型得到的最终堆积平均深度和最大深度与实测情况较为接近；每个时刻采用Medina侵蚀模型得到的最大速度值最大，其次是采用McDougall侵蚀模型的结果，最后是采用Pitman侵蚀模型的结果；采用McDougall侵蚀模型得到的侵蚀深度分布较为连续，其最大值8.1 m与估测值8 m比较接近，采用Medina侵蚀模型和Pitman侵蚀模型得到的侵蚀深度结果则较为分散，其最大值分别为10.9 m和8.6 m。

Abstract

Numerical simulation of the dynamic process of Nomash River debris flow was carried out using the continuous theory method in this study. Three different entrainment rate models were applied in the continuous theory model

and the HLLC approximate Riemann solution was used to calculate the interface flux of the control unit of the finite volume numerical discrete. Calculation results of disaster scope and motion time were in good agreement with the actual disaster situation

which verified the correctness and validity of the simulation. Then

the final accumulation depth

motion velocity and erosion depth were analyzed and discussed. The results showed that the average depth and maximum depth of final accumulation obtained using McDougall entrainment model were close to those measured. The maximum velocity obtained using the Medina entrainment model at each time was the largest

followed by the result of McDougall entrainment model and the result of Pitman entrainment model. The erosion depth distribution using McDougall erosion model was more continuous

and the maximum value of 8.1 m was close to the estimated value of 8 m. The erosion depth results obtained using Medina erosion model and Pitman erosion model were more dispersed

and their maximum values were 10.9 m and 8.6 m

respectively.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

149

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Coupling mechanism of seepage and heat transfer in rock fracture based on physics-informed neural networks

Influence of construction gap on the force of steel lining in compressed air storage cavern

Stability and failure mode analysis of tunnel face in composite ground with upper sand and lower clay layers

Characterization method for the three-dimensional soil cutting failure surface based on damage energy dissipation

Pullout simulation on fully grouted rock bolts based on residual shear strength

Related Author

WANG Zhi-liang1

XIAO Zhi-huan1

SHEN Lin-fang1

LI Shao-Jun2

ZHANG Gui-min

SUN Wen-qing

ZHU Ze-fan

SU Yong-kang

Related Institution

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology

State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology

State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology

School of Highway, Chang’an University

AI问答

⁰