QU Hong-lue, LI Rui-feng, ZHANG Jian-jing, et al. Comparative analysis of seismic response characteristics of two representative sheet pile walls[J]. 2017, 38(5): 1335-1342.
QU Hong-lue, LI Rui-feng, ZHANG Jian-jing, et al. Comparative analysis of seismic response characteristics of two representative sheet pile walls[J]. 2017, 38(5): 1335-1342.DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.05.014.
Comparative analysis of seismic response characteristics of two representative sheet pile walls
Investigations into damaged geotechnical structures after earthquakes reveal that the sheet pile wall has good seismic performance
especially reinforced by anchor cables. However
the research about sheet pile wall mostly focuses on its behavior under static conditions at present
while scarce achievements on dynamic response and seismic working mechanism yet. The comparative study of seismic response characteristics regarding two types of sheet pile wall
namely sheet pile wall and anchored sheet pile wall
has not been reported in literatures. In this paper
sheet pile wall and anchored sheet pile wall are tested in a large scale shaking table test
and dynamic characteristics of these two types of structures are analyzed. The experiment results show that the dynamic responses of time histories of earth pressures
anchor cable tensions
and displacements of pile from these two types of structures are closely relate to input seismic parameter characteristics
e.g. curve shape and variation trend. The occurrence time between peak value and peak ground acceleration is consistent. The installment of anchor cables can stabilize slope and restrict displacement of pile efficiently
especially in high seismic intensity zones where soil nonlinearity increases. Prestressed anchor cables can constrain displacement of pile. The displacement of sheet pile wall is 2.4 times of displacement of anchored sheet pile wall when the seismic coefficient reaches 0.4. The application of prestress in anchor cables can generate pseudo-active counter pressure from pile to soil
resulting in increased internal force in cantilever segment. Under the conditions of static loading and 0.1 of seismic coefficient
the landslide thrusts and soil resistance of two types are close. The maximum difference of measured intensity is less than 20 percent
indicating minor anchor cable effect. When seismic coefficient is larger than 0.2
anchor cables improves the compatibility of deformation. In this situation
the interactive force between pile and soil increases
and resistance of soil decreases greatly
and the slope is more stable. Meanwhile
the cable tension makes internal force larger in cantilever segment. Thus cantilever segment should be strengthened in structural design
and embedded segment can be weaken appropriately. The achievement of analysis provides reference for seismic design
rebuilding after earthquake
and revision of related specifications in high seismic intensity zones.