LI Xiao-juan, DAI Guo-liang, GONG Wei-ming, et al. Research on conversion factor of self-balanced loading test in sandy soil[J]. 2016, 37(S1): 659-668.
DOI:
LI Xiao-juan, DAI Guo-liang, GONG Wei-ming, et al. Research on conversion factor of self-balanced loading test in sandy soil[J]. 2016, 37(S1): 659-668.DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S1.087.
Research on conversion factor of self-balanced loading test in sandy soil
ratio of downward shaft resistance to upward shaft resistance
is critically important for the accuracy of bearing capacity and final decision of pile loading test. To study the appropriate value of γ in sandy soil
3 typical construction projects are chosen. All of their main soil layer are sandy soil; and the self-balanced loading test and head-down loading test are conducted at every site. And then a pile from self-balanced loading test and one from head-down loading test are picked as a group. In these groups
the geometrical sizes
geological condition and construction method of the two piles are same or similar. Because the results from traditional loading test are more convincing than ones from self-balanced loading test in general
the results from top-down loading test are taken as references; and then the Matlab is used to find the optimal fitting solution of γ
latterly
returning the value to the simplified capacity equation of the self-balanced loading test
and comparing the result of equivalent top-loaded settlement curve with ones from γ used in actual project and from head-down loading test
? = 0.6 and 0.7. The results show that: (1) The fitted values of ? from 3 projects are ranged from 0.47 to 0.71
which are rather smaller than that used in actual projects. (2) The accuracy of ? has large effect on the values of Qs (skin friction) and sss (elastic compression from skin friction distribution) of upper piles of the equivalent pile. (3) Compared with the top-loaded settlement curve from traditional loading test
the results from the optimal fitting solution of ? fit much better than of which used in actual project
which means that values of ? used in these projects are overly conservative
which cause overly conservative judgement of bearing capacity. (4) It is suggested that the value of conversion factor ? in sandy soil about 0.6 to 0.7.