Comparison study of reinforcement effect of HDPE/PET geogrids in fill embankment

JIA Min-cai; QIANG Xiao; YE Jian-zhong

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2015.S1.085

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comparison study of reinforcement effect of HDPE/PET geogrids in fill embankment

更新时间：2026-06-25

- Comparison study of reinforcement effect of HDPE/PET geogrids in fill embankment
- Vol. 36, Issue S1, Pages: 491-495(2015)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海,200092
  2. 同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海,200092
  3. 浙江省交通规划设计研究院,浙江,杭州,310006
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16285/j.rsm.2015.S1.085
  CLC： U416.1
- Online First：14 June 2018，
  
  Published：2015
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
JIA Min-cai, QIANG Xiao, YE Jian-zhong. Comparison study of reinforcement effect of HDPE/PET geogrids in fill embankment[J]. 2015, 36(S1): 491-495.
DOI：

JIA Min-cai, QIANG Xiao, YE Jian-zhong. Comparison study of reinforcement effect of HDPE/PET geogrids in fill embankment[J]. 2015, 36(S1): 491-495. DOI： 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.S1.085.

摘要

为了研究高密度聚乙烯（HDPE）和聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯（PET）两种土工格栅在返包式加筋路堤中的加筋效果，基于HDPE和PET的拉伸试验结果，采用FLAC3D有限差分程序并结合现场监测数据对比，分析了加筋路堤中两种土工格栅的受力变形规律。结果表明，土工格栅特性对返包式加筋路堤变形具有明显影响，影响程度与其上部土压力大小密切相关；在加筋土路堤的中下部，土压力较大，HDPE格栅前1/3段和后1/3段的应变存在较大差别，PET格栅的应变沿长度分布相对均匀；随着上部土压力的减小，格栅材料特性的影响减弱，两种格栅的应变曲线趋于接近；PET格栅对加筋路堤水平变形的控制作用更为明显；HDPE格栅加筋路堤的垂直和水平土压力值及其分布与PET加筋路堤差别很小。

Abstract

In order to figure out the difference of reinforcement effect between high-density polyethylene(HDPE) geogrids and polyethylene terephthalate(PET) geogrids in fill embankment with wrapped face

based on tensile tests of two geogrids

this paper analyzes the force-deflection characteristics of two different geogrids-reinforced embankment by means of FLAC3D and some in-situ tested data. The results show that the mechanical properties of geogrids have an obvious influence on the displacement of reinforced embankment; and the influence is related to its overlying earth pressure. In the middle and lower part of the embankment

because of the higher earth pressure value

there exists a relatively huge variance in strain value of HDPE geogrids along its length

and the variance of strain value of PET geogrids is within a narrow range; in the upper part of the embankment

the less earth pressure value leads to the lower strain value of geogrids and there is no various strain difference between the two types of geogrids. PET geogrids are better than HDPE geogrids in the effect of controlling displacement of the reinforced embankment. The distribution of vertical and horizontal earth pressures has less difference between PET and HDPE reinforced embankment.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

184

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Stability evaluation and supporting scheme for deepening excavation of existing foundation pit

FLAC3D simulation of horizontal displacement and axial force of soil nailing in silty sand soil nailing wall

Stability analysis of close-located underground caverns based on tunnel lining and equivalent anchor bolt simulation

Determination of engineering parameters based on mutable characteristics of monitored values in numerical simulation

Numerical model and validation of failure mode for underground caverns in layered rock mass

Related Author

CAI Hai-bo

WU Shun-chuan

ZHOU Yu

SHAN Ren-liang

DONG Hong-guo

WEI Long-fei

WEI Wen-kang

Lü Jin-yang

Related Institution

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing

Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co., Ltd., China Metallurgical Group Corporation

School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology

Xinxing Baoxin Construction Corporation

Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University

AI问答

⁰