Hg Formation and Transformation Characteristics in Flue Gas of Coal-fired Boiler

Xiaoxue AN; Sheng SU; Jun XIANG; Jianxun HUANG; Jizhuang XU; Lele WANG; Yi WANG; Song HU; Zijun YIN; Zhonghui WANG

doi:10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20079

English Version Reader LoginJournal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Hg Formation and Transformation Characteristics in Flue Gas of Coal-fired Boiler

Factory Green Island and Digital Twin Technology | 更新时间：2025-07-04

- Hg Formation and Transformation Characteristics in Flue Gas of Coal-fired Boiler
- Power Generation Technology Vol. 41, Issue 5, Pages: 489-496(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.煤燃烧国家重点实验室(华中科技大学), 湖北省武汉市 430074
  2.厦门华夏国际电力发展有限公司, 福建省厦门市 361026
  3.西安热工研究院有限公司苏州分公司, 江苏省苏州市 215153
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1910214);National Natural Science Foundation of China(51976072);SDIC Power Technology Project(2020-KJ-007)
- DOI：10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20079
  CLC： TK16
- Received：04 September 2020，
  
  Published：31 October 2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Xiaoxue AN, Sheng SU, Jun XIANG, et al. Hg Formation and Transformation Characteristics in Flue Gas of Coal-fired Boiler[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2020, 41(5): 489-496.
DOI：

Xiaoxue AN, Sheng SU, Jun XIANG, et al. Hg Formation and Transformation Characteristics in Flue Gas of Coal-fired Boiler[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2020, 41(5): 489-496. DOI： 10.12096/j.2096-4528.pgt.20079.

摘要

研究了300 MW煤粉锅炉系统选择性催化还原（selective catalytic reduction，SCR）、低低温电除尘器、海水脱硫、湿式电除尘器等超低排放设施在不同工况、不同煤种情况下的Hg迁移特性和脱除能力。结果表明：各工况下总汞排放浓度为1.16~2.90 μg/m

。最终排入大气中的汞主要以单质汞存在，还有少量氧化态汞，颗粒态汞被全部脱除；汞主要是在海水法烟气脱硫中被去除的，低低温电除尘器、海水脱硫、湿式电除尘器对总汞平均脱除率分别为25%、62%、37%；Hg

占比是影响烟气中汞脱除效率的关键，气相中较高的Hg

份额有利于在电除尘器和海水脱硫装置中获得较高的脱除效率；在该配备SCR脱硝、低低温电除尘器、海水脱硫、湿式电除尘器等超低排放设施的300 MW煤粉锅炉电厂中，总汞平均脱除率约为83%，能够实现较大程度的汞脱除。

Abstract

The transfer characteristics and removal capability of Hg in ultra-low emission facilities such as selective catalytic reduction (SCR)

low temperature electrostatic precipitator

seawater desulfurization and wet electrostatic precipitator in a 300 MW coal-fired boiler of a power plant were studied under different working conditions and different types of coal. The results show that under different working conditions

the total emission concentration of

mercury is basically 1.16-2.90 μg/m

. The final release of mercury into the atmosphere is mainly composed of elemental mercury and a small amount of oxidized mercury

the particulate mercury was completely removed. Most mercury is removed in seawater flue gas desulfurization. The overall removal efficiency of mercury of low temperature electric precipitator

a seawater flue gas desulfurization scrubber and wet electric precipitator is 25%

62% and 37% respectively on average. The proportion of Hg

is the key to affect the efficiency of mercury removal in flue gas

and the higher proportion of Hg

in flue gas is beneficial to obtain higher efficiency in electrostatic precipitators and seawater flue gas desulfurization devices. In the 300 MW coal-fired boiler of a power plant equipped with a selective catalytic reduction unit

a low temperature electrostatic precipitator

a seawater flue gas desulfurization scrubber

and a wet electrostatic precipitator and other ultra-low emission facilities

the average removal rate of total mercury is about 83%

which can achieve greater levels of mercury removal.

关键词

Keywords

references

中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴:2019[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2019.

National Bureau of Statistics of China.China statistical yearbook:2019[M].Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2019.

岑可法, 姚强, 骆仲泱.燃烧理论与污染控制[M].北京:机械工业出版社, 2004.

Cen K F, Yao Q, Luo Z Y.Combustion theory and pollution control[M].Beijing:China Machine Press, 2004.

朱跃, 杨用龙.燃煤电厂超低排放湿法脱硫治霾影响分析[J].发电技术, 2020, 41(3):295-300.

Zhu Y, Yang Y L.Influence analysis on haze control of ultra-low emission wet flue gas desulfurization of coal-fired power plants[J].Power Generation Technology, 2020, 41(3):295-300.

陈招妹, 刘含笑, 崔盈, 等.燃煤电厂烟气中SO 3 的生成、危害、测试及排放特征研究[J ] .发电技术, 2019, 40(6):564-569.

Chen Z M, Liu H X, Cui Y, et al. Study on generation, hazard, testing and emission characteristics of SO 3 in flue gas of coal-fired power plants[J ] .Power Generation Technology2019, 40(6):564-569.

李德波, 曾庭华, 廖永进, 等.火电厂超低排放技术路线关键技术与工程应用[J].广东电力, 2018, 31(1):17-24.

Li D B, Zeng T H, Liao Y J, et al. Key technology for ultra-low emission technical route selection of thermal power plant and related engineering application[J].Guangdong Electric Power, 2018, 31(1):17-24.

王起超, 沈文国, 麻壮伟.中国燃煤汞排放量估算[J].中国环境科学, 1999(4):318-321.

Wang Q C, Shen W G, Ma Z W.The estimation of mercury emission from coal combustion in China[J].China Environmental Science, 1999(4):318-321.

Belevi H, Moench H.Factors determining the element behavior in municipal solid waste incinerators.1.field studies[J].Environmental Science&Technology, 2000, 34(12):2501-2506.

Raik S, Heinz K, Heinz G.Oxidation and reduction of mercury by SCR DeNO x catalysts under flue gas conditions in coal fired power plants[J ] .Applied Catalysis B Environmental, 2014, 144:486-497.

张安超, 宋军, 盛伟, 等.煤燃烧前及现有污染物控制装置脱汞技术[C]//18届全国二氧化硫氮氧化物汞污染防治技术暨细颗粒物治理技术研讨会.洛阳, 2014.

Zhang A C, Song J, Sheng W, et al.Mercury removal technology before coal combustion and existing pollutant control devices[C]//18th National Symposium on Prevention and Control Technology of Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxide and Mercury Pollution and Fine Particulate Matter Control Technology.Luoyang, 2014.

Pudasainee D, Kim J H, Yoon Y S, et al.Oxidation, reemission and mass distribution of mercury in bituminous coal-fired power plants with SCR, CS-ESP and wet FGD[J].Fuel, 2012, 93:312-318.

Ito S, Yokoyama T, Asakura K.Emissions of mercury and other trace elements from coal-fired power plants in Japan[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 368(1):397-402.

周劲松, 骆仲泱, 任建莉, 等.燃煤汞排放的测量及其控制技术[J].动力工程学报, 2002, 22(6):2099-2104.

Zhou J S, Luo Z Y, Ren J L, et al.Measurement and control of mercury emissions from coal-fired boilers[J].Power Engineering, 2002, 22(6):2099-2104.

Su S, Liu L J, Wang L L, et al.Mass flow analysis of mercury transformation and effect of seawater flue gas desulfurization on mercury removal in a full-scale coal-fired power plant[J].Energy Fuel, 2017, 31(10):11109-11116.

蒋靖坤, 郝吉明, 吴烨, 等.中国燃煤汞排放清单的初步建立[J].环境科学, 2005, 26(2):35-39.

Jiang J K, Hao J M, Wu Y, et al.Development of mercury emission inventory from coal combustion in China[J].Environmental Science, 2005, 26(2):35-39.

Zhang M Z, Wang P, Dong Y, et al.Study of elemental mercury oxidation over an SCR catalyst with calcium chloride addition[J].Chemical Engineering Journal Lausanne, 2014, 253:243-250.

Hiroyuki K, Shun-ichiro U, Toshiyuki N, et al.Mercury ox idation over the V 2 O 5 (WO 3 )/TiO 2 commercial SCR catalyst[J ] .Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47(2):8136-8141..

Zhuang Y, Laumb J, Liggett R, et al.Impacts of acid gases on mercury oxidation across SCR catalyst[J].Fuel Processing Technology, 2007, 88(10):929-934.

王运军.燃煤烟气汞形态转化及汞吸附机理研究[D].南京: 东南大学, 2010.

Wang Y J.Study on mercury transformation in coal- fired flue gas and mercury adsorption on mechanism[D].Nanjing: Southeast University, 2010.

Hower J C, Senior C L, Suuberg E M, et al.Mercury capture by native fly ash carbons in coal-fired power plants[J].Progress of Energy Combust Science, 2010, 36(4):510-529.

Ochoa-Gonzalez R, Diaz-Somoano M, Martinez- Tarazona M R.Influence of limestone characteristics on mercury re-emission in WFGD systems[J].Environmental Science&Technology, 2013, 47(6):2974-2981.

杨宏旻, LIU Kun-lei, CAO Yan, 等.电站烟气脱硫装置的脱汞特性试验[J].动力工程学报, 2006, 26(4):554-557.

Yang H M, Liu K L, Cao Y, et al.Demercurization property of flue gas desulfurization[J].Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2006, 26(4):554-557.

莫华, 朱法华, 王圣, 等.湿式电除尘器在燃煤电厂的应用及其对PM 2.5 的减排作用[J ] .中国电力, 2013, 46(11):62-65.

Mo H, Zhu FH, Wang S, et al.Application of WESP in coal-fired power plants and its effect on emission reduction of PM 2.5 [J ] .Electric Power, 2013, 46(11): 62-65.

殷立宝, 禚玉群, 徐齐胜, 等.中国燃煤电厂汞排放规律[J].中国电机工程学报, 2013, 33(29):1-9.

Yin L B, Zhuo Y Q, Xu Q S, et al.Mercury emission from coal-fired power plants in China[J].Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(29):1-9.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Application and Optimization Research on Combined Denitrification Technology in 350 MW Supercritical Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler

Research on Coal Calorific Value Prediction Based on K-Means Clustering and Ridge Regression Algorithm

Numerical Simulation of Fly Ash Deposition Characteristics and Flow Field Optimization for SCR External Flue

Improvement and Engineering Application on Pulse Power Supply of Electrostatic Precipitator in Coal-Fired Power Plant

Study on the Characteristics of Heavy Metal Lead in Desulfurization Sludge Solidified by Coal-Fired Fly Ash in Power Plant

Related Author

LI Jianjun

SHANG Manxia

DONG Hailong

LI Bingming

HUANG Zhong

QIAO Shichao

CHEN Heng

LI Bo

Related Institution

Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education (Tsinghua University), Haidian District

Guangxi Hualei New Material Co., Ltd. Power Plant, Baise 531499, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region

Beijing Key Laboratory of Emission Surveillance and Control for Thermal Power Generation (North China Electric Power University), Changping District

College of Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University

Jiaxing New Jies Thermal Power Co., Ltd.

AI问答

⁰