Lin Rong-ji, Chen Wei, Huang Zhi-xin, et al. Assessment of Causal Effects of Butylphthalide-acute Ischemic Stroke Based on Instrumental Variables[J]. 2024, 41(1): 41-46.
Lin Rong-ji, Chen Wei, Huang Zhi-xin, et al. Assessment of Causal Effects of Butylphthalide-acute Ischemic Stroke Based on Instrumental Variables[J]. 2024, 41(1): 41-46.DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.230157.
Assessment of Causal Effects of Butylphthalide-acute Ischemic Stroke Based on Instrumental Variables
Causal effect analysis is an important and popular method in clinical statistics
which typically conducted based on the observational data. However
the analysis based on observed data may be affected by unobserved variables
which may produce bias
leading to estimate the causal effects inaccurately. Existing methods ignore the unobserved variables or are unable to find appropriate proxy variables to weaken this bias
which fail to provide reliable estimation of the causal effects. To address this problem
this paper proposes the instrumental variable method
a more accurate computational method than traditional approaches in the realm of clinical statistic for drug efficacy analysis. This method incorporates the effect of unobserved into the error term
to estimate the accurate causal effect. Under some mild assumptions
the variables in the observational data is considered as instrumental variables. Then
the proposed method calculates the effects of butylphthalide (i.e.
a drug) on patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the presence of unobserved variables. The causal effect of monthly prognosis and the confidence interval of this causal estimator is estimated. The study results show that the butylphthalide has a significant positive effect on the prognostic recovery of patients with acute ischemic stroke.
关键词
Keywords
references
YAO L, CHU Z, LI S, et al . A survey on causal inference [J ] . ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) , 2021, 15(5): 1-46.
IMBENS G W, RUBIN D B. Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
BRICK J M, KALTON G. Handling missing data in survey research [J]. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 1996, 5(3): 215-238.
ABADIE A, DRUKKER D, HERR J L, et al . Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata [J ] . The Stata Journal, 2004, 4(3): 290-311.
LOH W Y. Classification and regression trees [J]. WIREs:Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2011, 1(1): 14-23.
BENGIO Y, COURVILLER A, VINCENT P. Representation learning: a review and new perspectives [J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2013, 35(8): 1798-1828.
CARUANA R. Multitask learning [J]. Machine Learning, 1997, 28(1): 41-75.
HOSPEDALES T, ANTONIOU A, MICAELLI P, et al . Meta-learning in neural networks: a survey [J ] . IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2021, 44(9): 5149-5169.
BAIOCCHI M, CHENG J, SMALL D S. Instrumental variable methods for causal inference [J]. Statistics in Medicine, 2014, 33(13): 2297-2340.
MARTENS E P, PESTMAN W R, DE BOER A, et al . Instrumental variables: application and limitations [J ] . Epidemiology, 2006, 17(3): 260-267.
OHLSSON H, KENDLER K S. Applying causal inference methods in psychiatric epidemiology: a review [J]. JAMA Psychiatry, 2020, 77(6): 637-644.
BROOKHART M A, SCHNEEWEISS S. Preference-based instrumental variable methods for the estimation of treatment effects: assessing validity and interpreting results [J]. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2007, 3(1): 14.
MUKAMAL K J, STAMPFER M J, RIMM E B. Genetic instrumental variable analysis: time to call mendelian randomization what it is. The example of alcohol and cardiovascular disease [J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2020, 35: 93-97.
DAVEY SMITH G, EBRAHIM S. ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? [J]. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2003, 32(1): 1-22.
RASSEN J A, SCHNEEWEISS S, GLYNN R J, et al . Instrumental variable analysis for estimation of treatment effects with dichotomous outcomes [J ] . American Journal of Epidemiology, 2009, 169(3): 273-284.
伍德里奇. 计量经济学导论: 现代方法[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2017.
KIM H Y. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: risk difference, risk ratio, and odds ratio [J]. Restorative Dentistry Endodontics, 2017, 42(1): 72-76.
BROOKHART M A, WANG P, SOLOMON D H, et al . Evaluating short-term drug effects using a physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable [J ] . Epidemiology, 2006, 17(3): 268.
MCCOY C E. Understanding the intention-to-treat principle in randomized controlled trials [J]. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2017, 18(6): 1075.
MA H, ROBINS J M. Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream? [J]. Epidemiology, 2006, 17(4): 360-372.