He Wei-jun, Zhou Ying-tang. A Social Network Recommendation Algorithm Combining Strong and Weak Ties and Interests[J]. 2019, 36(3): 39-46.DOI: 10.12052/gdutxb.180112.
A Social Network Recommendation Algorithm Combining Strong and Weak Ties and Interests
Social network recommender systems combining strong and weak ties and interests are proposed. First
social relationship sets for customers are built based on the strong and weak ties
taking into account the breadth and depth of information transfer. Then
based on the association rules to improve the state transition probability of the PageRank Algorithm
the modified matrix is capable of measuring the social closeness between different customers more reasonably. Meanwhile
aiming to increase diversity and novelty of the systems
the similarity of interests between different customers is considered giving them the weight of voting in the candidate projects. Finally
the candidate items are scored and Top-
N
filtered to obtain a recomm
endation list. As is shown in the experiment results
the algorithm is more reasonable and effective than the reference algorithms.
关键词
Keywords
references
DAKHEL A M, MALAZI H T, MAHDAVI M. A social recommender system using item asymmetric correlation [J]. Applied Intelligence, 2018, 48(3): 527-540.
VAN S M. Supporting people in finding information: hybrid recommender systems and goalbased structuring[M]. Netherlands: Enschede, 2005: 16.
RECALDE L. A Social Framework for Set Recommendation in Group Recommender Systems[C]//European Conference on In-formation Retrieval. Aberdeen: Springer, 2017: 735-743.
YANG X, GUO Y, LIU Y, et al . A survey of collaborative filtering based social recommender systems [J ] . Computer Communications, 2014, 41(5): 1-10.
RICCI F, ROKACH L, SHAPIRA B, et al. Recommender systems handbook[M]. New York: Springer, 2011: 511-543.
MA H. An experimental study on implicit social recommendation[C]//Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. Dublin: ACM, 2013: 73-82.
GRANOVETTER M S. The strength of weak ties [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6): 1360-1380.
RAPOPORT A. Contribution to the theory of random and biased nets [J]. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 1957, 19(4): 257-277.
NARUCHITPARAMES J, GÜNEŞ M H, LOUIS S J. Friend recommendations in social networks using genetic algorithms and network topology[C] //Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2011 IEEE Congress on. New Orleans: IEEE, 2011: 2207-2214.
YIN X C, ZHU H M, WEI J, et al . Identifying weak ties with value of dissemination in online social networks [J ] . Journal of Intelligence, 2016, 35(3): 125-130.
ABRAMO G, D’ANGELO C A, SOLAZZI M. The relation-ship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of inter-nationalization of their research [J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 86(3): 629-643.
NAEGELE L, PLATH C. Weak ties get you in the job, strong ties keep you[C]//Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie. Heidelberg: springer, 2018, 51: 151-151.
LYU L, ZHOU T. Link prediction in weighted networks: The role of weak ties [J]. Europhysics Letters, 2010, 89(1): 18001.
ZHU B, XIA Y. Link prediction in weighted networks: A weighted mutual information model [J]. PloS one, 2016, 11(2): e0148265.
ZHANG Y W, YUE L H, ZHANG Y F, et al . Friends recommended method based on common users and similar labels [J ] . Journal of Computer Applications, 2013, 33(8): 2273-2275.
CHEN Z, JIANG Y, ZHAO Y. A collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm based on user interest change and trust evaluation [J]. Microcomputer Its Applications, 2010, 4(9): 106-113.
ZHANG Z, ZHENG X, ZENG D. A framework for diversifying recommendation lists by user interest expansion [J]. Know-ledge-based Systems, 2016, 105(5): 83-95.
XU J M, LIU M Y, WANG M. Microblog recommendation method based on extended interest of users [J]. Application Research of Computers, 2019(6): 1-6.
LI Y L, LUO P, ZHANG S R. Link prediction in social networks based on decision analysis [J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2017, 20(1): 64-74.
SINHA R, SWEARINGEN K. Comparing recommendations made by online systems and friends[C]//In Proceedings of the DELOS-NSF Workshop on Personalization and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries. Berlin: Springer, 2001.
GAO Y, LIU W F. A dynamic trust evaluation model based on optimized hidden markov process [J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2015, 47(3): 101-107.
GAN C M, ZHONG Q T, LUO T Y. Factors affecting trust formation in the context of social commerce [J]. Information Science, 2017(4): 68-73.
NEPAL S, PARIS C, POUR P A, et al. Interaction based con-tent recommendation in online communities[C] //International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Berlin: Springer, 2013: 14-24.
ARNABOLDI V, CAMPANA M G, DELMASTRO F, et al . A personalized recommender system for pervasive social networks [J ] . Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2017, 36: 3-24.