Decomposition and Application of Measurement Errors in Survey Sampling

Luo Wei

doi:10.12052/gdutxb.180042

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Decomposition and Application of Measurement Errors in Survey Sampling

更新时间：2026-05-27

- Decomposition and Application of Measurement Errors in Survey Sampling
- Vol. 35, Issue 4, Pages: 51-55(2018)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 广东工业大学　管理学院,广东,广州,510520
  2. 广东工业大学　大数据战略研究院,广东,广州,510006
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.12052/gdutxb.180042
  CLC： C811
- Published：2018
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
罗薇. 抽样调查中计量误差的分解及应用[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2018, 35(4): 51-55.

Luo Wei. Decomposition and Application of Measurement Errors in Survey Sampling[J]. 2018, 35(4): 51-55.
罗薇. 抽样调查中计量误差的分解及应用[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2018, 35(4): 51-55. DOI： 10.12052/gdutxb.180042.

Luo Wei. Decomposition and Application of Measurement Errors in Survey Sampling[J]. 2018, 35(4): 51-55. DOI： 10.12052/gdutxb.180042.

摘要

建立了以计量误差作为随机变量的一般性计量误差模型

从方差和计量偏差两类误差效应来对误差进行分解

进一步从方差中分离出计量方差

包括简单计量方差和相关计量方差

以及抽样方差

并得出上述误差的计算公式和估计方法. 针对抽样实践中最常见的调查员误差

结合调查员分配方式

提出使得重复调查中计量结果的相关系数尽可能小是控制相关计量方差的关键

而增加子样本中调查员的数量可以有效减少调查员方差.

Abstract

With measurement error modeled as the random variables

a general measurement error model is presented. It decomposes the errors into variance and measurement bias. The variance can be further decomposed into measurement variance and sampling variance. The measurement variance is composed with simple measurement variance and correlated measurement variance. The calculation formula and estimation method of the above errors are obtained. According to the most common interviewer effects in survey practice

combined with investigator assignments

it is proposed that the low correlation coefficient of measurement results in repeated surveys is the key to control the correlation measurement variance

and that increasing the sub-sample interviewers can effectively reduce investigator variance.

关键词

Keywords

references

SARNDL C E, SWENSSON B, WRETMAN J H. Model assisted survey sampling [M]. New York: Springer, 2003: 601-614.

BUZAS J S, STEFANSKI L A, TOSTESON T D. Measurement error [M]. New York: Springer, 2014: 1241-1282.

LOKEN E, GELMAN A. Measurement Error and the Replication Crisis [J]. Science, 2017, 355(6325): 584-585.

WANG H, JIN Y J. Error effects analysis approach for statistical data accuracy evaluation [J]. Statistics Information Forum, 2009, 24(9): 10-16.

FERRO C A T, FRICKER T E. A bias-corrected decomposition of the brier score [J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2012, 138(668): 1954-1960.

SCHOOT R V D, SCHMIDT P, BEUCKELAER A D, et al . Editorial: measurement invariance [J ] . Front Psychol, 2015, 6: 1064.

ROOVER D, TIMMERMAN K, MARIEKE E, et al . What's hampering measurement invariance [J ] . Front Psychol, 2015, 5: 604.

YU C, ZHANG S, FRIEDENREICH C, et al . Using repeated measures to correct correlated measurement errors through orthogonal decomposition [J ] . Communication in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 2017, 46(23): 11604-11611.

BLATTMAN C, JAMISON J, KOROKNAY-PALICZ T, et al . Measuring the measurement error: a method to qualitatively validate survey data [J ] . Journal of Development Economics, 2016, 120: 99-112.

ABOWD J M, STINSON M H. Estimating measurement error in annual job earnings: a comparison of survey and administrative data [J]. Review of Economics Statistics, 2013, 95(5): 1451-1467.

BIEMER, PAUL P, GROVES R M, et al . Interviewer, respondent, and regional office effects on response variance: a statistical decomposition [J ] . Applied Physics Letters, 2016, 86(7): 074104-074104.

WANG K L. Measurement models and measurement methods for interviewer errors [J]. Statistics Decision, 2009, 298(22): 11-12.

HANSON R H, MARKS E S. Influence of the interviewer on the accuracy of survey results [J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1958, 53(283): 635-655.

ELLIOTT M R, WEST B T. “Clustering by Interviewer”: a source of variance that is unaccounted for in single-stage health surveys [J]. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2015, 182(2): 118-126.

DIJKSTRA W. How interviewer variance can bias the results of research on interviewer effects [J]. Quality and Quantity, 1983, 17(3): 179-187.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Bimodal Iterative Cross-attention Fusion Ensemble Framework

Energy Management Strategy of Hybrid Locomotive Based on Road Condition Parameters

An Optimal Operation Strategy for Community Microgrid Alliances Considering Power Exchange under Multi-package Shared Energy Storage Model

Ground Deformation Monitoring and Influencing Factors Analysis in Fuzhou City Based on PSI Technology

Research and Implementation of a Pulsed Laser Ranging Method Based on Digital Mixing

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

AI问答

⁰