
1. 国网冀北电力有限公司营销服务中心,北京,100045
2. 华北电力大学 电气与电子工程学院,北京,102206
3. 国网冀北电力有限公司营销部,北京,100054
4. 华北电力大学 国家能源发展战略研究院,北京,102206
Online First:22 June 2026,
Published:2026
移动端阅览
张誉宝, 郜宇涵, 谢枫, 熊超, 何翠超, 刘洪涛, 王鹏. 计及节点中心性的新能源场站接入策略多维度评价[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59(6): 166-178.
ZHANG Yubao, GAO Yuhan, XIE Feng, et al. Multi-dimensional evaluation of renewable energy plant access strategy considering node centrality[J]. 2026, 59(6): 166-178.
张誉宝, 郜宇涵, 谢枫, 熊超, 何翠超, 刘洪涛, 王鹏. 计及节点中心性的新能源场站接入策略多维度评价[J]. 中国电力, 2026, 59(6): 166-178. DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202508011.
ZHANG Yubao, GAO Yuhan, XIE Feng, et al. Multi-dimensional evaluation of renewable energy plant access strategy considering node centrality[J]. 2026, 59(6): 166-178. DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202508011.
新能源装机规模快速增长,但新能源场站在接入节点、接入结构和组织方式上存在多维度差异,导致的并网特性差异尚不明确,是电力系统规划面临的重要难题。采用特征向量中心性方法对可并网节点进行分类,结合不同组织方式与接网结构提炼新能源场站接网典型场景进行仿真,在经济性、可靠性和结算便利性3个维度构建评价指标体系并进行对比分析。结果表明,短接线、受潮流约束影响少的方案经济性较优,建设成本较其他方案可下降3%~12%;在一般节点采用直接接入方案具有较高可靠性,但在极端天气下仍需通过复杂结构增强韧性;当接入主体超过4个时,计量与责任划分趋于复杂,结算便利性明显下降。研究结果可为电力系统进行精细化规划提供理论依据。
At present
the installed capacity of renewable energy in China is growing rapidly. However
differences of renewable energy stations in access nodes
grid connection structures
and organizational modes lead to unclear grid-integration characteristics
posing a critical challenge to power system planning. This paper uses the eigenvector centrality method to classify grid-accessible nodes
and combines different organizational modes and access structures to build typical access scenarios for simulation. An evaluation index system is established covering economy
reliability
and settlement convenience. Comparative analysis results show that short connections with fewer power flow constraints have better economic performance
with construction costs reduced by 3%~12% compared with alternative schemes. Direct connection at conventional nodes offers high reliability
yet elaborate structures are needed to improve system resilience under extreme weather conditions. In addition
Metering and liability allocation become complicated and settlement convenience declines markedly when the number of access entities exceeds four. This work provides a theoretical references for refined power system planning.
1林正根. 2024年中国可再生能源发展状况[J]. 电力科技与环保, 2025, 41 (4): 691.
2董昱, 郭强, 葛睿, 等. 国外高比例新能源电力系统大停电事故分析及启示[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45 (22): 8754- 8764.
DONG Yu, GUO Qiang, GE Rui, et al. Analysis and Lessons of recent blackout events in high-proportion renewable energy power systems worldwide[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45 (22): 8754- 8764.
3金雍奥, 王庆滨. 冀北清洁能源基地新能源装机破8000万千瓦[N]. 中国电力报, 2025-06-13(1).
4CHEN Z L, ZHOU M, WU Z Y, et al. Attribution analysis to Co-planning renewable energy and storage capacity based on Shapley Additive Explanation[J]. Energy, 2025, 325, 136168.
5王守文, 郭蕊, 王树斌. 中国能源韧性与科技创新的协调演化及影响因素研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2025 (1): 208- 224.
WANG Shouwen, GUO Rui, WANG Shubin. Research on the coordinated evolution and influencing factors of energy resilience and scientific and technological innovation in China[J]. China Soft Science, 2025 (1): 208- 224.
6李博, 陈民铀, 钟海旺 , 等. 高比例可再生能源新型电力系统长期规划综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43 (2): 555- 581.
LI Bo, CHEN Minyou, ZHONG Haiwang, et al. A Review of long-term planning of new power systems with large share of renewable energy[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43 (2): 555- 581.
7陈奇芳, 李若凡, 夏明超, 等. 计及多维性能评估的新型配电网光伏选址定容方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (10): 172- 178, 207.
CHEN Qifang, LI Ruofan, XIA Mingchao, et al. Photovoltaic site selection and capacity determination method for new distribution network considering multidimensional performance evaluation[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (10): 172- 178, 207.
8邱洁, 梁财豪, 朱永强, 等. 考虑氢能储运特性的配电网集群划分与氢能系统选址定容策略[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (8): 12- 22.
QIU Jie, LIANG Caihao, ZHU Yongqiang, et al. Cluster configuration of electric-hydrogen coupled distribution network considering hydrogen energy transport characteristics[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (8): 12- 22.
9白望望, 杨德州, 李万伟, 等. 基于HC-MOPSO的储能电站两阶段选址定容方法[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (12): 148- 156.
BAI Wangwang, YANG Dezhou, LI Wanwei, et al. A two-stage site selection and capacity determination method for energy storage power stations based on HC-MOPSO[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (12): 148- 156.
10程耀华, 张宁, 王佳明, 等. 面向高比例可再生能源并网的输电网规划方案综合评价[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43 (3): 33- 42, 57.
CHENG Yaohua, ZHANG Ning, WANG Jiaming, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of transmission network planning for integration of high-penetration renewable energy[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43 (3): 33- 42, 57.
11瞿雷, 杜振东. 基于组合权重与云模型的电网规划综合评价方法研究[J]. 上海电力大学学报, 2023, 39 (4): 332- 338.
QU Lei, DU Zhendong. Research on comprehensive evaluation method of power grid planning based on combined weights and cloud model[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Electric Power, 2023, 39 (4): 332- 338.
12李翠萍, 朱文超, 李军徽, 等. 分布式电源接入中压配电网的运行方案研究[J]. 东北电力大学学报, 2023, 43 (04): 57- 64.
LI Cuiping, ZHU Wenchao , LI Junhui, et al. Research on the operation scheme of distributed generation access to medium voltage distribution network[J]. Journal Of Northeast Electric Power University, 2023, 43 (04): 57- 64.
13刘昆. 变电站电气主接线方案对比分析[J]. 大众用电, 2022, 37 (9): 46- 47.
LIU Kun. Comparative analysis of electrical main wiring schemes in substations[J]. Popular Utilization of Electricity, 2022, 37 (9): 46- 47.
14康龙, 纪元, 李欣悦. 风电场接入系统方案研究[J]. 青海电力, 2024, 43 (2): 8- 13.
KANG Long, JI Yuan, LI Xinyue. Research on wind farm access system scheme[J]. QINGHAI ELECTRIC POWER, 2024, 43 (2): 8- 13.
15杜明坤, 黄媛, 刘俊勇, 等. 考虑梯级电站开发规划接入的电网适应性综合评估[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2021, 33 (9): 1- 8, 16.
DU Mingkun, HUANG Yuan, LIU Junyong, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on grid adaptability considering the access of cascaded power stations under planning and development[J]. Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, 2021, 33 (9): 1- 8, 16.
16夏巨龙, 张硕. 某200 MW光伏电站电气主接线设计[J]. 电工技术, 2021 (10): 77- 79.
XIA Julong, ZHANG Shuo. Electric main wiring design of a 200 MW photovoltaic power station[J]. Electric Engineering, 2021 (10): 77- 79.
17马小慧, 甘云山, 曾红梅, 等. 基于电力市场交易的电量退补方法研究[J]. 广西电力, 2022, 45 (5): 33- 36, 52.
MA Xiaohui, GAN Yunshan, ZENG Hongmei, et al. Research on power refund and compensation method based on electricity market transactions[J]. Guangxi Electric Power, 2022, 45 (5): 33- 36, 52.
18李占江, 唐鹏, 赵福林, 等. 新能源多厂共站关口计量与自动化结算系统设计[J]. 自动化仪表, 2024, 45 (2): 29- 34.
LI Zhanjiang, TANG Peng, ZHAO Fulin, et al. Design of new energy multi-plant co-station gateway metering and automated settlement system[J]. Process Automation Instrumentation, 2024, 45 (2): 29- 34.
19杨利森, 石钟文, 李学庆, 等. 基于电能量采集系统的新能源多场景结算机制[J]. 科技创新导报, 2021, 18 (5): 85- 87.
YANG Lisen, SHI Zhongwen, LI Xueqing, et al. New energy multi-scenario settlement mechanism based on electric energy acquisition system[J]. Science and Technology Innovation Herald, 2021, 18 (5): 85- 87.
20郑欣, 杨建华, 魏伟, 等. 一种换流站及其核心设备功率损耗的测量方法[J]. 电测与仪表, 2025, 62 (6): 194- 201.
ZHENG Xin, YANG Jianhua, WEI Wei, et al. An approach of power loss measurement for converter station and its key equipment[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2025, 62 (6): 194- 201.
21胡军. 大规模间歇性新能源并网控制技术研究[J]. 电力设备管理, 2021 (3): 119- 121.
HU Jun. Research on large-scale intermittent new energy grid-connected control technology[J]. Electric Power Equipment Management, 2021 (3): 119- 121.
22刘起兴, 雷傲宇, 翟哲, 等. 基于拓扑特征提取的电网结构韧性评估方法[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58 (12): 27- 36, 49.
LIU Qixing, LEI Aoyu, ZHAl Zhe, et al. An assessment method for power grid structural resilience based on topological feature extraction[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58 (12): 27- 36, 49.
23FORSBERG S, THOMAS K, BERGKVIST M. Power grid vulnerability analysis using complex network theory: a topological study of the Nordic transmission grid[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2023, 626: 129072.
24DONG J L, SONG Z L, ZHENG Y S, et al. Identification of critical links based on electrical betweenness and neighborhood similarity in cyber-physical power systems[J]. Entropy, 2024, 26 (1): 85.
25王子欣, 苗世洪, 郭舒毓, 等. 基于复杂系统理论的电力通信耦合网络模型构建及节点重要度评估方法[J]. 高电压技术, 2022, 48 (1): 84- 94.
Wang Zixin, Miao Shihong, Guo Shuyu, et al. Construction of power communication coupling network model and node importance evaluation method based on complex system theory[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2022, 48 (1): 84- 94.
26刘新苗, 刘俊磊, 娄源媛, 等. 基于时序模拟的风火打捆送出消纳规划优化方法[J]. 南方电网技术, 2025, 19 (8): 53- 63.
LIU Xinmiao, LIU Junlei, LOU Yuanyuan, et al. Planning optimization method for transmission and consumption of wind-thermal bundled based on time series simulation[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2025, 19 (8): 53- 63.
27李英, 车亦柠. 新版《供电营业规则》解读[J]. 大众用电, 2024, 39 (4): 8- 10.
28毕京斌, 丁斌, 王佩玲. 新能源场站π接或T接已建线路对电网的影响对比分析[J]. 通信电源技术, 2024, 41 (6): 216- 218.
BI Jingbin, DING Bin, WANG Peiling. Comparative analysis of the impact of π-connected or T-connected existing power lines on the power grid in new energy stations[J]. Telecom Power Technology, 2024, 41 (6): 216- 218.
29李志远, 王建学, 邓娇娇, 等. 基于变电站并网方案精细化建模的输电系统规划方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45 (18): 7017- 7030.
LI Zhiyuan, WANG Jianxue, DENG Jiaojiao, et al. Transmission system planning method based on refined modeling of substation grid-connection scheme[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45 (18): 7017- 7030.
30田京京, 邢康. 基于复杂网络与电气特性的风电光伏并网脆弱性分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2025, 25 (6): 2379- 2388.
TIAN Jingjing, XING Kang. Vulnerability analysis of wind power and photovoltaic integration based on complex network and electrical characteristics[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2025, 25 (6): 2379- 2388.
32LIU H T, ZHAI R R, PATCHIGOLLA K, et al. Multi-objective optimisation of a thermal-storage PV-CSP-wind hybrid power system in three operation modes[J]. Energy, 2023, 284, 129255- 129271.
33吴军, 杨超峰, 王林, 等. 台风灾害下的电-热综合能源系统韧性评估方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2025, 45 (10): 12- 21.
WU Jun, YANG Chaofeng, WANG Lin, et al. Resilience assessment method for integrated electricity and district heating system under typhoon disaster[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2025, 45 (10): 12- 21.
34阮前途, 谢伟, 许寅, 等. 韧性电网的概念与关键特征[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40 (21): 6773- 6784.
RUAN Qiantu, XIE Wei, XU Yin, et al. Concept and key features of resilient power grids[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40 (21): 6773- 6784.
35TOCTAQUIZA J, CARRIÓN D, JARAMILLO M, et al. An electrical power system reconfiguration model based on optimal transmission switching under scenarios of intentional attacks[J]. Energies, 2023, 16 (6): 2879.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621