
1. 济南大学 数学科学学院,山东,济南,250022
2. 国网能源研究院有限公司,北京,102209
3. 水电水利规划设计总院,北京,100120
Published Online:23 October 2025,
Published:2025
移动端阅览
权培英, 金艳鸣, 徐沈智. 区域碳双控下跨区电力间接碳排放核算方法[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(10): 63-70.
QUAN Peiying, JIN Yanming, XU Shenzhi. Accounting Methods for Indirect Carbon Emissions from Cross-regional Electricity under Dual Carbon Control Policies[J]. 2025, 58(10): 63-70.
权培英, 金艳鸣, 徐沈智. 区域碳双控下跨区电力间接碳排放核算方法[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(10): 63-70. DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202504020.
QUAN Peiying, JIN Yanming, XU Shenzhi. Accounting Methods for Indirect Carbon Emissions from Cross-regional Electricity under Dual Carbon Control Policies[J]. 2025, 58(10): 63-70. DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202504020.
跨区电力间接碳排放核算关系到中国“十五五”主要送端与受端地区的碳预算管理。针对传统属地法核算偏差大、绿证衔接不足等问题,提出按照电力来源地因子、流入地因子、煤电净调入量及绿证消费调整的4种核算方法,量化评估2023年跨区跨省电力碳排放转移规模,比较不同核算方法对区域碳预算的影响。研究表明:不同方法下跨区电力间接碳排放核算结果差异显著,华东、华北等电力受端区域碳排放核算结果波动幅度超10%;“全国平均因子×绿证调整”的核算机制可动态修正受端地区的碳排放责任,建议跨区电力间接碳排放核算须立足区域协同发展与电力资源配置效率,综合考虑送受端地区责任分担机制及绿证制度确定。
The accounting of cross-regional electricity indirect carbon emissions is crucial to the carbon budget management of major power-sending and power-receiving regions during China's "15th Five-Year Plan" period. To address such issues as significant inaccuracies in traditional territorial-based accounting methods and insufficient integration of green electricity certificates
four alternative accounting methods
including the power source-based emission factor method
the power import-based emission factor method
the net coal-power transfer adjustment method
and the green certificate consumption adjustment method
are proposed to quantitatively assess the scale of carbon emission transfers via cross-regional and inter-provincial electricity transmission in 2023
and the impacts of different accounting methods on regional carbon budgets are compared. The study reveals that the accounting results of indirect carbon emissions from cross-regional electricity are varied significantly with different methods
with fluctuations exceeding 10% in key power-importing regions such as East China and North China; the accounting mechanism based on the "national average emission factor adjusted with green certificates" can dynamically refine the carbon emission responsibilities of power-importing regions. It is recommended that the accounting of indirect carbon emissions from cross-regional electricity transmission should be grounded in regional coordinated development and the efficiency of power resource allocation
with comprehensive consideration of the responsibility-sharing mechanisms between sending and receiving regions as well as the green certificate system.
1李丰. 低碳经济战略视角下碳排放交易市场研究[J]. 四川轻化工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 35 (2): 53- 69. DOI
LI Feng. Carbon emissions trading market from the perspective of low carbon economy strategy[J]. Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 35 (2): 53- 69. DOI
4MENG X, YU Y N. Can renewable energy portfolio standards and carbon tax policies promote carbon emission reduction in China's power industry?[J]. Energy Policy, 2023, 174, 113461. DOI
5JIUSTO S. The differences that methods make: cross-border power flows and accounting for carbon emissions from electricity use[J]. Energy Policy, 2006, 34 (17): 2915- 2928. DOI
6国家发展和改革委员会. 省级温室气体清单编制指南(试行)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2011.
7卢露. 碳中和背景下完善我国碳排放核算体系的思考[J]. 西南金融, 2021, (12): 15- 27.
LU Lu. Thoughts on perfecting China's carbon emission accounting system under the background of carbon neutrality[J]. Southwest Finance, 2021, (12): 15- 27.
8刘广一, 王继业, 汤亚宸, 等. 电网碳排放因子研究方向与应用需求的演变进程[J]. 电网技术, 2024, 48 (1): 12- 28.
LIU Guangyi, WANG Jiye, TANG Yachen, et al. Evolution process of research directions and application requirements of electricity carbon emission factors[J]. Power System Technology, 2024, 48 (1): 12- 28.
9DODGE J, PREWITT T, TACHET DES COMBES R, et al. Measuring the carbon intensity of AI in cloud instances[C]//2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency. Seoul Republic of Korea. ACM, 2022: 1877–1894.
10PIZER W, SANCHIRICO J N, BATZ M. Regional patterns of U. S. household carbon emissions[J]. Climatic Change, 2010, 99 (1): 47- 63.
11中国电力企业联合会. 2023年电力工业统计资料汇编[R]. 北京: 中国电力企业联合会, 2023.
12袁惊柱. 加快构建新型电力系统的进展、主要风险与对策建议[J]. 中国国情国力, 2025, (2): 4- 8.
13张建斌, 韩宇, 刘卓航. 跨省跨区绿色电力市场化交易的阻滞因素与推进思路[J]. 北方经济, 2024, (12): 40- 44.
14曾培炎. 西电东送: 开创中国电力新格局[J]. 中共党史研究, 2010, (3): 5- 13, 131.
15陈文福. 贵州西电东送的绩效评估[J]. 统计与决策, 2005, 21 (9): 59- 61.
16中国电力企业联合会. 中国电力统计年鉴-2023[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2023.
17国家能源局电力业务资质管理中心. 《中国绿色电力证书发展报告(2024)》[R]. 北京: 国家能源局电力业务资质管理中心, 2025.
18王成仁. 促进煤电与风光电融合发展的路径研究: 以晋蒙陕新煤炭富集地区为例[J]. 全球化, 2023, (4): 112- 125, 136.
WANG Chengren. Research on the path to promote the integrated development of coal power and wind and photovoltaics: take the new coal-rich areas of Jin-Meng-Shaan-Xin as an example[J]. Globalization, 2023, (4): 112- 125, 136.
19王永平, 刘畅, 胥威汀, 等. 高比例水电新型电力系统理论模型探索[J]. 四川电力技术, 2023, 46 (6): 3- 9, 20.
WANG Yongping, LIU Chang, XU Weiting, et al. Theoretical model exploration of new power system with high-proportional hydropower[J]. Sichuan Electric Power Technology, 2023, 46 (6): 3- 9, 20.
20郭亚军, 冯宗宪. 电力消费对生态效率的作用路径及效应研究[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22 (1): 83- 93.
GUO Yajun, FENG Zongxian. Research on the path and effect of electricity consumption on eco-efficiency[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2022, 22 (1): 83- 93.
22陈书林, 杨莉. 长三角地区碳达峰碳中和情景预测研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2024, 33 (10): 2260- 2270.
CHEN Shulin, YANG Li. Scenario prediction of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2024, 33 (10): 2260- 2270.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621