
1. 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司,广东,广州,510663
2. 西安交通大学 电气工程系,陕西,西安,710049
3. 中国南方电网有限责任公司,广东,广州,510663
Published Online:01 December 2025,
Published:01 December 2025
移动端阅览
潘廷哲, 靳丰源, 陆泳昊, 曹望璋, 阳浩, 于鹤洋, 赵勃扬. 智能小区电动汽车充电动态电价策略设计[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(11): 14-24, 37.
PAN Tingzhe, JIN Fengyuan, LU Yonghao, et al. Design of Dynamic Pricing Strategy for Electric Vehicles Charging in Smart Communities[J]. 2025, 58(11): 14-24.
潘廷哲, 靳丰源, 陆泳昊, 曹望璋, 阳浩, 于鹤洋, 赵勃扬. 智能小区电动汽车充电动态电价策略设计[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(11): 14-24, 37. DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202503024.
PAN Tingzhe, JIN Fengyuan, LU Yonghao, et al. Design of Dynamic Pricing Strategy for Electric Vehicles Charging in Smart Communities[J]. 2025, 58(11): 14-24. DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.202503024.
智能小区利用需求响应对电动汽车和光储系统进行综合管理。然而,传统静态电价因忽视负荷实际响应,易引发新负荷高峰,导致等效负荷波动性增加。为此,提出一种动态电价策略。该动态电价不仅随时间变化,还与小区内部的净负荷水平相关。首先,运营者预测调度周期内的光伏出力与基础负荷,并据此构建动态电价的初始模型。其次,构建主从博弈框架:运营者作为领导者,在上层模型中以最小化等效负荷波动为目标,制定并发布动态电价,且安排储能出力;电动汽车作为跟随者,在下层模型中响应动态电价,并以最小化充电成本为目标,优化其充电策略。进一步,在该下层模型中,动态电价的引入使得电动汽车充电决策相互依赖,形成聚合博弈结构,其最优充电负荷通过纳什均衡确定。最后,通过遗传算法实现对最优动态电价策略的求解。仿真结果表明,所提模型在保障电动汽车经济利益的同时,可有效规避负荷新高峰,平抑等效负荷曲线波动,实现小区运营者的管理目标。
Smart communities utilize demand response to achieve integrated management of electric vehicles (EVs) and photovoltaic-storage systems. However
traditional static pricing
which disregards actual load responses
tends to induce new load peaks and increases the volatility of the equivalent load. To address these challenges
this paper proposes a dynamic pricing strategy
wherein the price not only varies over time but is also correlated with the internal net load of the community. Firstly
the operator forecasts the photovoltaic generation and the baseline load within the scheduling horizon
and establishes the initial model of dynamic pricing. Secondly
a stackelberg game framework is constructed: the operator
as the leader in the upper-level model
aims to minimize the volatility of the equivalent load by formulating and publishing the dynamic prices as well as scheduling the energy storage output; EVs
as followers in the lower-level model
respond to the dynamic prices and optimize their charging strategies with the objective of minimizing charging costs. Furthermore
in the lower-level model
the introduction of dynamic pricing makes the charging decision of EVs mutually dependent
thereby forming an aggregative game structure
in which the optimal charging load of each EV is determined through the Nash equilibrium. Finally
the optimal dynamic pricing is determined through a genetic algorithm. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed model effectively reduces load volatility
avoids new load peaks
and achieves the management objectives of the community operator while safeguarding the economic interests of EV users.
1章建华, 林山青, 余兵, 等. 新型电力系统发展蓝皮书 [R]. 北京: 国家能源局, 2023.
ZHANG Jianhua, LIN Shanqing, YU Bing, et al. Blue book of new power system development[R]. Beijing: National Energy Administration, 2023.
4蔡湛, 李泽文, 邹睿奇, 等. 基于负荷转移的售电公司分时电价优化策略[J]. 南方电网技术, 2024, 18 (1): 77- 84.
CAI Zhan, LI Zewen, ZOU Ruiqi, et al. Optimization strategy of time-of-use electricity price for electricity selling companies based on load transfer[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2024, 18 (1): 77- 84.
5崔金栋, 罗文达, 周念成. 基于多视角的电动汽车有序充放电定价模型与策略研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38 (15): 4438- 4450, 4644.
CUI Jindong, LUO Wenda, ZHOU Niancheng. Research on pricing model and strategy of electric vehicle charging and discharging based on multi view[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38 (15): 4438- 4450, 4644.
6朱永胜, 苗阳, 谢晓峰, 等. 新能源微电网多层级车网协同优化策略[J]. 智慧电力, 2023, 51 (2): 61- 68. DOI
ZHU Yongsheng, MIAO Yang, XIE Xiaofeng, et al. Multi-level vehicle-grid collaborative optimization strategy for new energy microgrid[J]. Smart Power, 2023, 51 (2): 61- 68. DOI
7王世谦, 贾一博, 白宏坤, 等. 分时电价下电动汽车参与虚拟电厂的经济优化调度方法[J]. 电力需求侧管理, 2023, 25 (5): 19- 26. DOI
WANG Shiqian, JIA Yibo, BAI Hongkun, et al. Economic optimization scheduling method of electric vehicle participating in virtual power plant under time-of-use price[J]. Power Demand Side Management, 2023, 25 (5): 19- 26. DOI
8康童, 朱吉然, 冯楚瑞, 等. 面向光储充一体化社区的有序充电策略研究[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2024, 52 (9): 132- 142.
KANG Tong, ZHU Jiran, FENG Churui, et al. An orderly charging strategy for a photovoltaic-storage-charging integrated community[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2024, 52 (9): 132- 142.
9许博, 岳欣明, 关艳, 等. 针对用电负荷“峰谷倒挂”现象的混合型电力需求响应策略[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42 (8): 2129- 2138. DOI
XU Bo, YUE Xinming, GUAN Yan, et al. A hybrid demand response strategy to solve the problem of "peak valley inversion" in power grid[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2022, 42 (8): 2129- 2138. DOI
10李咸善, 周晓岚, 姚俊伟, 等. 考虑车主多模式需求响应模糊意愿的优化调度策略[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2023, 51 (2): 89- 101.
LI Xianshan, ZHOU Xiaolan, YAO Junwei, et al. Optimal dispatch strategy considering fuzzy intention of multi-mode demand response of vehicle owners[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2023, 51 (2): 89- 101.
11MISHRA M K, PARIDA S K. A game theoretic horizon decomposition approach for real-time demand-side management[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2022, 13 (5): 3532- 3545. DOI
12MISHRA M K, PARIDA S K. A game theoretic approach for demand-side management using real-time variable peak pricing considering distributed energy resources[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2022, 16 (1): 144- 154. DOI
13王长春, 王果, 赵倩宇, 等. 考虑分时电价和充电利用率特征的大型电动汽车充电站负荷短期预测方法[J]. 南方电网技术, 2024, 18 (5): 75- 84.
WANG Changchun, WANG Guo, ZHAO Qianyu, et al. A short-term load forecasting method for large scale electric vehicle charging stations considering characteristics of charging utilization rate and time-of-use electricity price[J]. Southern Power System Technolog, 2024, 18 (5): 75- 84.
14郭之栋, 胡存刚, 芮涛, 等. 基于动态电价机制的用户侧分布式储能电能交易策略[J]. 中国电力, 2023, 56 (1): 28- 37.
GUO Zhidong , HU Cungang, RUI Tao, et al. User side distributed energy storage trading strategy based on dynamic electricity price mechanism[J]. Electric Power, 2023, 56 (1): 28- 37.
15邓衍辉, 李剑, 卢国强, 等. 考虑分区域动态电价机制引导的电动汽车充电优化策略[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2024, 52 (7): 33- 44.
DENG Yanhui, LI Jian, LU Guoqiang, et al. Charging optimization strategy of electric vehicles guided by the dynamic tariff mechanism of a subregion[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2024, 52 (7): 33- 44.
16PACCAGNAN D, GENTILE B, PARISE F, et al. Nash and wardrop equilibria in aggregative games with coupling constraints[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2019, 64 (4): 1373- 1388. DOI
17JACQUOT P, WAN C. Nonatomic aggregative games with infinitely many types[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2022, 301 (3): 1149- 1165. DOI
18JACQUOT P, BEAUDE O, GAUBERT S, et al. Analysis and implementation of an hourly billing mechanism for demand response management[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019, 10 (4): 4265- 4278. DOI
19BELGIOIOSO G, YI P, GRAMMATICO S, et al. Distributed generalized Nash equilibrium seeking: an operator-theoretic perspective[J]. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2022, 42 (4): 87- 102. DOI
20HUPEZ M, TOUBEAU J F, ATZENI I, et al. Pricing electricity in residential communities using game-theoretical billings[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2023, 14 (2): 1621- 1631. DOI
21BAHARLOUEI Z, NARIMANI H, HASHEMI M. On the convergence properties of autonomous demand side management algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018, 9 (6): 6713- 6720. DOI
22徐智威, 胡泽春, 宋永华, 等. 基于动态分时电价的电动汽车充电站有序充电策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34 (22): 3638- 3646.
XU Zhiwei, HU Zechun, SONG Yonghua, et al. Coordinated charging strategy for PEV charging stations based on dynamic time-of-use tariffs[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34 (22): 3638- 3646.
23张良, 孙成龙, 蔡国伟, 等. 基于PSO算法的电动汽车有序充放电两阶段优化策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42 (5): 1837- 1852.
ZHANG Liang, SUN Chenglong, CAI Guowei, et al. Two-stage optimization strategy for coordinated charging and discharging of EVs based on PSO algorithm[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42 (5): 1837- 1852.
24张西竹, 刘洵源, 杨文涛, 等. 动态分时电价机制下的电动汽车分层调度策略[J]. 电力建设, 2018, 39 (12): 73- 80. DOI
ZHANG Xizhu, LIU Xunyuan, YANG Wentao, et al. A hierarchical scheduling strategy for electric vehicles under dynamic time-of-use tariff mechanism[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2018, 39 (12): 73- 80. DOI
25呙金瑞, 张智俊, 窦春霞. 基于信息间隙决策理论与动态分时电价的电动汽车接入虚拟电厂双层经济调度策略[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2022, 42 (10): 77- 85.
GUO Jinrui, ZHANG Zhijun, DOU Chunxia. Bi-level economic dispatch strategy for electric vehicles connecting to virtual power plant based on information gap decision theory and dynamic time-of-use price[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2022, 42 (10): 77- 85.
26GLICKSBERG I L. A further generalization of the kakutani fixed point theorem, with application to Nash equilibrium points[J]. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 1952, 3 (1): 170- 174.
27邓盛盛, 陈皓勇, 肖东亮, 等. 考虑碳市场交易的寡头电力市场均衡分析[J]. 南方电网技术, 2024, 18 (1): 143- 152.
DENG Shengsheng, CHEN Haoyong, XIAO Dongliang, et al. Equilibrium analysis of oligopoly electricity market considering carbon market trading[J]. Southern Power System Technology, 2024, 18 (1): 143- 152.
28FACCHINEI F, PANG J S. Finite-dimensional variational inequalities and complementarity problems[M]. New York: Springer, 2003.
29杨健维, 黄宇, 王湘, 等. 基于动态概率潮流的住宅区电动汽车代理商定价策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36 (21): 5822- 5830, 6025.
YANG Jianwei, HUANG Yu, WANG Xiang, et al. A pricing strategy for electric vehicle aggregator in residential area based on dynamic probability power flow[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2016, 36 (21): 5822- 5830, 6025.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621