Shihao ZHOU, Benren PAN, Yong WAN, et al. An Improved Method for J-A Hysteresis Parameter Identification of Current Transformer Core[J]. Electric power, 2021, 54(7): 109-116.
DOI:
Shihao ZHOU, Benren PAN, Yong WAN, et al. An Improved Method for J-A Hysteresis Parameter Identification of Current Transformer Core[J]. Electric power, 2021, 54(7): 109-116. DOI: 10.11930/j.issn.1004-9649.201908012.
An Improved Method for J-A Hysteresis Parameter Identification of Current Transformer Core
To simulate the dynamic magnetization process of the current transformer core
an accurate hysteresis model needs to be established. The improved J-A hysteresis model can simulate the hysteresis characteristics of core more accurately. In this paper
an improved J-A hysteresis model parameter identification method for current transformer based on fireworks algorithm is proposed to determine the key parameter of the improved J-A hysteresis model. Firstly
the modified J-A model is established
and then the parameter identification model is constructed. The sum of the absolute error between the obtained magnetic induction and the known magnetic induction are taken as the objective function
and the model parameters are introduced into the fireworks algorithm as variables. When a new spark is generated
the check of whether the spark meets the constraints is added. Finally
the hysteresis curves of P-type and PR-type current transformers are identified by the proposed method. The results show that the obtained hysteresis curve has a small deviation from the actual curve. The added spark check link can reduce the number of iterations required for algorithm convergence. The effectiveness and adaptability of the proposed method has been verified by simulation results.
XU Feng, LI Kaicheng, JIN Bo, et al . Research on locating saturation of current transformer[J ] . Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2016, 53(17): 1–5.
QI Xuanwei, LI Lou, HUANG Xiaoming, et al . Study on the CT saturation and mal-operation of the transformer current differential protection during external faults[J ] . Power System Protection and Control, 2017, 45(20): 44–51.
DUAN Jiandong LEI Yang, JIN Zhuanting, et al . Empirical analysis on transient saturation on characteristic of current transformer[J ] . Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2018, 38(7): 207–123.
ZHANG Jie, YE Guowei, LIU Xiang, et al . Critical technology and equipment development of transient characteristics test on electronic current transformer for protection[J ] . High Voltage Engineering, 2017, 43(12): 3884–3891.
DUAN Jiandong, JIN Zhuanting, LEI Yang, et al . Study on residual fluxsuppression of current transformer during automatic reclosing[J ] . Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(5): 1498–1504.
YU Buxin, BU Jing, YIN Minghui. Improved identification of CT saturation based on transient current characteristics[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2018, 38(4): 29–35.
WANG Feng, HUANG Minghui, LI Yiquan, et al . New principle of generator-transformer large differential protection based on improved Hausdorff distance[J ] . Power System Protection and Control, 2019, 47(12): 40–47.
YUAN Mingjun, JIANG Hao, LI Qiang, et al . Study on key technology for real-time dynamic monitoring slave station of power system[J ] . Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2019, 34(1): 109–114.
WU Jiaqi, LI Xiaohua, CHEN Zhong, et al . A transformer model with hysteresis characteristics for electromagnetic transients basedon PSCAD/EMTDC and excitation difference analysis[J ] . Proceedings of the CSEE, 2017(5): 298–307.
SONG X F, LARS D, BENNY L, et al. Modeling and identification of hysteresis with modified Preisach model in piezoelectric actuator[C]// 2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM). IEEE, 2017.
XING Jiawei, JIN Neng, LIN Xiangning, et al . A novel strategy of current transformer saturation identification and valid data application based on wavelet packet[J ] . Transaction of China Electrotechnical Society, 2019, 34(6): 1170–1179.
YANG L, ZHU L H, ZHU J G. Core loss calculation based on finite-element method with Jiles–Atherton dynamic hysteresis model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2018, 54(3): 1–5.
JILES D, THOELKE J, Devine M. Numerical determination of hysteresis parameters for the modeling of magnetic properties using the theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1992, 28(1): 27–35.
GENG Chao, WANG Fenghua, SU Lei, et al . Parameter identification of Jiles-Atherton model for transformer based on hybrid artificial fish swarm and shuffled frog leaping algorithm[J ] . Proceedings of the CSEE, 2015, 35(18): 4799–4807.
LI Xiaoping, PENG Qingshun, LI Jinbao, et al . Parameter identification of hysteresis loop model for transformer core[J ] . Power System Technology, 2012, 36(2): 200–205.
ANNAKKAGE U D, MCLAREN P G, DIRKS E, et al . A current transformer model based on the Jiles-Atherton theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis[J ] . IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2000, 15(1): 57–61.
JILES D C, ATHERTON D L. Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis[J]. Journal of Magnetism&Magnetic Materials, 1986, 61: 48–60.
LI Zhen, LI Qingmin, LI Changyun, et al . Queries on the J-A modeling theory of the magnetization process in ferromagnets and proposed correction method[J ] . Proceedings of the CSEE, 2011, 31(3): 124–131.
QI Xuanwei, YIN Xianggen, LI Gan, et al . A construction method for the simulation platform for the analysis of the current transformer[J ] . Power System Protection and Control, 2015(22): 69–76.
TAN Y, ZHU Y. Fireworks algorithm for optimization[C]// Advances in Swarm Intelligence, First International Conference, ICSI 2010, Beijing, China, June 12-15, 2010, Proceedings, Part I. Springer-Verlag, 2010.
HAO Xiaoliang, YE Meiying. Parameter calculation of the Jiles-Atherton hysteresis model using particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Normal University(Nat. Sci.), 2015, 38(2): 133–141.
DRAGO G, MANELLA A, NERVI M, et al . A combined strategy for optimization in non linear magnetic problems using simulated annealing and search techniques[J ] . IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1992, 28(2): 1541–1544.