Zhenhua Jiang, Wei Xia, Yanli Zhang, Xinrui Wang, Mingyuan Dong, Kun Chen, Dong Liu, Baowang Lu, A comprehensive comparative study on SAPO-34 and ZSM-5 catalyst for the conversion of ethanol-to-light olefins, Clean Energy, Volume 9, Issue 3, June 2025, Pages 115–127, https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkaf007
DOI:
Zhenhua Jiang, Wei Xia, Yanli Zhang, Xinrui Wang, Mingyuan Dong, Kun Chen, Dong Liu, Baowang Lu, A comprehensive comparative study on SAPO-34 and ZSM-5 catalyst for the conversion of ethanol-to-light olefins, Clean Energy, Volume 9, Issue 3, June 2025, Pages 115–127, https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkaf007DOI:
A comprehensive comparative study on SAPO-34 and ZSM-5 catalyst for the conversion of ethanol-to-light olefins
摘要
This study aims to compare the catalytic performance of ZSM-5 and SAPO-34 zeolite catalysts in the conversion of ethanol. Through experiments conducted at different temperatures (773 and 673 K)
it was found that SAPO-34 initially exhibits superior propylene selectivity compared to ZSM-5. However
the propylene yield on SAPO-34 gradually decreases
while the ethylene yield increases with time on stream. Density functional theory calculations were employed for the investigation of the reaction mechanism. The results indicate that the SAPO-34 catalyst surface favors propylene desorption
which is beneficial for its initial high propylene selectivity. Nevertheless
the smaller pore structure of SAPO-34 limits the effective diffusion of products
leading to product accumulation within the pores and potentially causing catalyst coking and deactivation. By combining the experimental results with theoretical calculations
this study not only explored the selectivity difference between SAPO-34 and H-ZSM-5 in ethanol conversion reaction but also revealed the influence of different molecular sieve catalyst structures on product distribution and catalyst stability.
Abstract
This study aims to compare the catalytic performance of ZSM-5 and SAPO-34 zeolite catalysts in the conversion of ethanol. Through experiments conducted at different temperatures (773 and 673 K)
it was found that SAPO-34 initially exhibits superior propylene selectivity compared to ZSM-5. However
the propylene yield on SAPO-34 gradually decreases
while the ethylene yield increases with time on stream. Density functional theory calculations were employed for the investigation of the reaction mechanism. The results indicate that the SAPO-34 catalyst surface favors propylene desorption
which is beneficial for its initial high propylene selectivity. Nevertheless
the smaller pore structure of SAPO-34 limits the effective diffusion of products
leading to product accumulation within the pores and potentially causing catalyst coking and deactivation. By combining the experimental results with theoretical calculations
this study not only explored the selectivity difference between SAPO-34 and H-ZSM-5 in ethanol conversion reaction but also revealed the influence of different molecular sieve catalyst structures on product distribution and catalyst stability.
Kinetic insights and optimization of catalytic pyrolysis from brown macroalgae: evaluation of commercial catalyst performance
Investigation of performance and emission characteristics using ethanol-blended gasoline fuel as a flex-fuel in two-wheeler vehicle mounted on a chassis dynamometer
Enhanced methanol-to-olefins (MTO) performance over SAPO-34 molecular sieves synthesized using novel sources of silicon and aluminium
Constraints on symmetry energy and n/p effective mass splitting with improved quantum molecular dynamics model
New Geiger-Nuttall law of odd-Z nuclei and long-lived island beyond the stable line
Related Author
Apip Amrullah
Obie Farobie
Muhammad Aziz
Hery Irawansyah
Gunawan R Cahyono
Sourabh Gupta
Sumit Kanchan
Rupinder Kaur
Related Institution
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Lambung Mangkurat University
Department of Mechanical and Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, IPB University (Bogor Agricultural University)
Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo
Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Lambung Mangkurat University
School of Mechanical Engineering, Lovely Professional University