Tao Zhang, Jinming Zhai, Zhengrong Shi, et al. Comparison of PV and PV/T systems in different regions of China: Energy gain, energy cost, energy payback and energy return[J]. Energy and Built Environment, 2026, 7(2): 253-266.
DOI:
Tao Zhang, Jinming Zhai, Zhengrong Shi, et al. Comparison of PV and PV/T systems in different regions of China: Energy gain, energy cost, energy payback and energy return[J]. Energy and Built Environment, 2026, 7(2): 253-266. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbenv.2024.12.001.
Comparison of PV and PV/T systems in different regions of China: Energy gain, energy cost, energy payback and energy return
摘要
Abstract
The photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) system offers the potential for highly efficient cogeneration and presents significant opportunity for practical applications as compared to pure PV system. However
there is less research concentrating on comprehensive comparison between these two systems. In this study
mathematical models for both conventional PV system and water-cooled PV/T system are first established; then
annual effective energy gains of these two systems can be determined. In particular
five representative cities in various climatic zones of China including Harbin
Beijing
Shanghai
Kunming
and Guangzhou are involved. Furthermore
a comprehensive comparison between the two systems
considering levelized cost of electricity (LCOE)
energy payback time (EPBT)
energy return on invested (EROI)
and carbon emission reductions (CER)
is conducted based on energy gains. The results show that the annual electricity gain of PV system is 9.3–23.5 % more than that of PV/T system because of the low operation temperature. But the comprehensive efficiency of PV/T system can be improved by 19.1–33.3 % because of the extra heat gain. It's noteworthy that the performance of PV/T system is notably influenced by the interplay between ambient temperature and solar irradiation
the highest energy gain is observed in mild climate regions devoid of extreme cold conditions. Despite the PV/T system incurring an initial investment and operational and maintenance costs 1.7 times higher than that of the PV system
along with approximately three times the energy consumption during production
it demonstrates a favourable annual energy return. Upon computation
the LCOE is estimated to decrease by approximately 47.2 % to 59.8 %
the EPBT can be shortened by 0 % to 25.0 %
the EROI is projected to increase by 0 % to 47.3 %
and the CER is enhanced by three times when compared to pure PV system.