Comparing time history methods of input ground motion for large span continuous rigid frame bridge
|更新时间:2026-06-25
|
Comparing time history methods of input ground motion for large span continuous rigid frame bridge
Vol. 35, Issue S1, (2014)
作者机构:
1. 同济大学 土木工程防灾国家重点实验室,上海,200092
2. 井冈山大学 建筑工程学院,江西,吉安,343009
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:P315.61
Online First:20 June 2014,
Published:2014
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LUO Chao, LOU Meng-lin, GUI Guo-qing. Comparing time history methods of input ground motion for large span continuous rigid frame bridge[J]. 2014, 35(S1).
DOI:
LUO Chao, LOU Meng-lin, GUI Guo-qing. Comparing time history methods of input ground motion for large span continuous rigid frame bridge[J]. 2014, 35(S1).DOI:
Comparing time history methods of input ground motion for large span continuous rigid frame bridge
Based on a site of a large span continuous rigid frame bridge in Shanghai
the influence of hydrodynamic pressures on ground motion is discussed. The input ground motion has been obtained by using the response spectrum of code
one-dimension model and two-dimension model. It shows that hydrodynamic pressures can reduced the vertical acceleration response significantly
while it has little effect on horizontal acceleration response. The ground motion calculated by two-dimension model which consider the topography is quite different from that of other two models. The predominant periods of input ground motion calculated by two-dimension model exceeds the flat section of response spectrum of code. Finally
the influence range of valley topography is discussed
which shows that the influence region in the direction normal to the river is no more than 5 times of soil layer thickness or 140 times of deepness of the river valley. Any structures in this region should take river valley influence into consideration.