Comparative analysis of multiple factors affecting seepage flow of splitting sandstone with fillers or non-fillers
|更新时间:2026-06-25
|
Comparative analysis of multiple factors affecting seepage flow of splitting sandstone with fillers or non-fillers
Vol. 35, Issue 8, (2014)
作者机构:
三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北,宜昌,443002
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:TU451
Online First:14 August 2014,
Published:2014
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LIU Jie, LI Jian-lin, HU Jing, et al. Comparative analysis of multiple factors affecting seepage flow of splitting sandstone with fillers or non-fillers[J]. 2014, 35(8).
DOI:
LIU Jie, LI Jian-lin, HU Jing, et al. Comparative analysis of multiple factors affecting seepage flow of splitting sandstone with fillers or non-fillers[J]. 2014, 35(8).DOI:
Comparative analysis of multiple factors affecting seepage flow of splitting sandstone with fillers or non-fillers
Taking the splitting sandstone from Yichang as the research object
the paper respectively studies about seepage flow variation rules caused by axial compressions
confining pressures
splitting surface area
concave-convex height different
trace length
2D projected area of splitting surface
import and export length and joint roughness. The results suggest that the axial compression and seepage flow are in linear increasing relation whether the specimen is filled or not; confining pressures and seepage flow are in a relationship of logarithmic decrement when the specimen is unfilled
while in linear relation as the specimen is filled. Under non-filler condition
the seepage area has a cubic function to the seepage velocity
while there is no influence under filling condition
and at the same time
the concave-convex height difference
2D projected area have the same rule with seepage velocity. Analysis suggests that the influence on seepage passages of the three factors is far from that caused by fillers; under non-filler condition
the trace length reduces linearly with the seepage velocity; the joint roughness coefficient shows a quadratic functional relationship with the seepage flow whether the specimen is filled or not. These rules can guide the priorities of factors in the seepage measurement
and effectively reduce the measurement of those secondary factors and provide a reference for numerical simulation of seepage.