Similar material test study of dynamic failure of jointed rock mass with SHPB
|更新时间:2026-06-25
|
Similar material test study of dynamic failure of jointed rock mass with SHPB
Vol. 35, Issue 3, (2014)
作者机构:
1. 中国地质大学(北京) 工程技术学院,北京,100083
2. 西藏大学 工学院,拉萨,850000
3. 河南理工大学 土木工程学院,河南,焦作,454000
4. 长安大学 地质工程与测绘学院,西安,710064
5. 中国有色金属工业西安勘察设计研究院,西安,710064
6. 北京科技大学 土木工程与环境学院,北京,100083
7. 河北承德钢铁公司,河北,承德,067000
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:TU458
Online First:19 March 2014,
Published:2014
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LIU Hong-yan, DENG Zheng-ding, WANG Xin-sheng, et al. Similar material test study of dynamic failure of jointed rock mass with SHPB[J]. 2014, 35(3).
DOI:
LIU Hong-yan, DENG Zheng-ding, WANG Xin-sheng, et al. Similar material test study of dynamic failure of jointed rock mass with SHPB[J]. 2014, 35(3).DOI:
Similar material test study of dynamic failure of jointed rock mass with SHPB
Failure modes of jointed rock mass with different joint dip angles
joint discontinuity degrees
joint sets
load strain ratios
joint filling thicknesses
joint filling types and slenderness ratios under split Hopkinson pressure bar(SHPB) tests are studied by means of similar material model tests. The results show that failure modes and dynamic strength of jointed rock mass are much related to joint configuration. For rock mass with single joint
its strength and failure characteristics are greatly controlled by the joint dip angle. The dynamic strength of the specimens with joint dip angles of 0° and 90°
whose failure modes are both tensile failure
is 90% and 71% of that of intact one
respectively. The dynamic strength of the specimen with joint dip angle of 60° is nearly zero. The dynamic strength of the specimens with joint dip angles of 30° and 45°
whose failure modes are mainly shear failure with partly tensile failure
is 50% and 18% of that of intact one
respectively. The peak strength of the specimens with 1/4
1/2
4/5 and 1 joint center continuity degree is 95%
74%
28% and 17% of that of intact one
respectively. With increase of joint discontinuity degree
the dynamic strength of specimen decreases. The dynamic strength of the specimens with 1
2 and 3 groups of joints is 54%
23% and 10% of that of intact one
respectively. Namely
with increase of joint group
the dynamic strength of specimen decreases greatly; but its failure mode does not change. With increase of joint filling thickness and strength reduction of joint fillings
the dynamic strength of specimen decreases gradually; but its failure mode does not change. The dynamic strength of the intact and jointed specimens both increase with increasing of load strain ratio; and the sensitivity to load strain ratio of the former is much higher than that of the latter
whose failure mode becomes more complicated accordingly. The dynamic strength of these two kinds of specimens both first increase then decrease with the slenderness ratio; that is to say