Experimental study of soil arching of geogrid-reinforced and pile-supported widening embankment
|更新时间:2026-06-25
|
Experimental study of soil arching of geogrid-reinforced and pile-supported widening embankment
Vol. 34, Issue 8, (2013)
作者机构:
东南大学 岩土工程研究所,南京,210096
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:TU473
Online First:13 August 2013,
Published:2013
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
Lü Wei-hua, MIAO Lin-chang, WANG Fei, et al. Experimental study of soil arching of geogrid-reinforced and pile-supported widening embankment[J]. 2013, 34(8).
DOI:
Lü Wei-hua, MIAO Lin-chang, WANG Fei, et al. Experimental study of soil arching of geogrid-reinforced and pile-supported widening embankment[J]. 2013, 34(8).DOI:
Experimental study of soil arching of geogrid-reinforced and pile-supported widening embankment
Soil arching is very important for analyzing the stress state of existing and widening embankment and differential settlement between piles (caps) and subsoil. In this paper
the behavior of soil arching is analyzed for a widening embankment which is supported by rigid piles with caps and reinforced by geogrid. Based on the test site of the widening expressway project
earth pressures on caps and subsoil at the bottom and at different depths to fill surface are investigated; and tensile strains of the geogrid are monitored too. Then stress concentration ratios and soil arching ratios are analyzed and compared with several current design methods
including the Guido method
the BS8006 method
the Kempfert method and the Low method. Results show that
a two-dimensional plane soil arching fill load distribution on caps and subsoil within a critical arch height which is deduced to be 2.0 m owing a ratio of 1.4 the pile clear spacing
and is consistent with BS8006. The Guido and BS8006 methods were too conservative on assessing tensile strain of geogrid; Except for the Guido method
all rest presented design methods underestimated the resistance from the compressible subsoil. So
further study and a better understanding of soil arching should be developed.