Experiment study of marble mechanical properties of Jinping II hydropower station under complex loading and unloading conditions
|更新时间:2026-06-25
|
Experiment study of marble mechanical properties of Jinping II hydropower station under complex loading and unloading conditions
Vol. 34, Issue 8, (2013)
作者机构:
1. 中国水利水电科学研究院 岩土工程研究所,北京,100048
2. 北京科技大学 金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室,北京,100083
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:TU452
Online First:13 August 2013,
Published:2013
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LIU Li-peng, WANG Xiao-gang, JIA Zhi-xin, et al. Experiment study of marble mechanical properties of Jinping II hydropower station under complex loading and unloading conditions[J]. 2013, 34(8).
DOI:
LIU Li-peng, WANG Xiao-gang, JIA Zhi-xin, et al. Experiment study of marble mechanical properties of Jinping II hydropower station under complex loading and unloading conditions[J]. 2013, 34(8).DOI:
Experiment study of marble mechanical properties of Jinping II hydropower station under complex loading and unloading conditions
Rock mass surrounding the excavation also under the complex radial unloading and ring direction loading stress path due to the excavation
for which results in difference from that of rock mass strength,deformation property and failure mechanism. Aiming to the high in-situ stress characteristics of Jinping II hydropower station
four different stress paths are chosen as test schemes corresponding as the uniaxial compressive test
triaxial compressive test
unloading triaxial test and unloading confining – loading axial pressure full test under high stress conditions are carried out on the marble specimens from the drainage tunnel. The complete stress-strain curve,deformation properties,failure characteristics and limited energy storage are obtained under respective stress path. Some instructive conclusions are drawn from tests as follows: (1) The failure axial strain is generally small. Jinping marble is hard and brittle which more apparent under unloading conditions. (2) The axial strain
circumferential strain and volumetric strain value unloading confining – loading axial pressure full tests are generally higher in the unloading tests
peak strength conversely. (3) The deformation modulus is large and the peak strength is lower with larger unloading rate
the deformation modulus is lower and the peak strength is large with larger loading rate
the deformation modulus is lower and the peak strength is large with larger initial confining pressure. (4) The principally failure model is tension without confining pressure; shear failure and locally tensile failure with lower confining pressure; while shear failure shape is X or Y with higher confining pressure. (5) The rock specimens have the limited value of energy storage
which can be effected by various factors. Limited energy storage is large with high confining pressure and is lower with higher unloading stress rate. The results can offer valuable references in explaining the mechanism of rockbutst and solving underground rock engineering problems.