Numerical simulation of size effect on bearing capacity of large diameter rock-socketed piles under different strengths of surrounding rocks
|更新时间:2026-06-25
|
Numerical simulation of size effect on bearing capacity of large diameter rock-socketed piles under different strengths of surrounding rocks
Vol. 33, Issue S2, (2012)
作者机构:
1. 中铁大桥勘测设计院有限公司,武汉,430050
2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,武汉,430071
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:TU451
Online First:11 December 2012,
Published:2012
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LI Guang-yao, ZHAO Ke-lie, LU Zu-de. Numerical simulation of size effect on bearing capacity of large diameter rock-socketed piles under different strengths of surrounding rocks[J]. 2012, 33(S2).
DOI:
LI Guang-yao, ZHAO Ke-lie, LU Zu-de. Numerical simulation of size effect on bearing capacity of large diameter rock-socketed piles under different strengths of surrounding rocks[J]. 2012, 33(S2).DOI:
Numerical simulation of size effect on bearing capacity of large diameter rock-socketed piles under different strengths of surrounding rocks
The size effect coefficients of side and tip resistance of large diameter rock-socketed pile under 20 different conditions are obtained by using FLAC3D. The size effect on ultimate bearing capacity of rock-socketed bored piles with diameters of up to 3.4 m for Tainxingzhou Bridge caused by the excavation has been analyzed. The results show that: (1) The smaller the surrounding rock strength
the size effect of ultimate end of the pile resistance and ultimate friction resistance become greater
and the smaller the size effect coefficient. When the surrounding rock strength is 1-5 MPa
the damage of surrounding rock during excavation is obvious; the size effect is obvious. When the surrounding rock strength increasing to 10 MPa
the damage of surrounding rock during excavation is not obvious
the size effect is significantly weakened. (2) Under the same rock strength
the larger the pile diameter
the larger the size effect of the extreme end of the pile resistance and ultimate friction resistance and the smaller the size effect coefficient. Compared with pile side resistance
the size effect is more pronounced and the size effect of tip resistance coefficient is slightly smaller. (3) The relationship between size effect coefficient of ultimate end of the pile resistance and ultimate friction resistance and pile diameter is well fitted with the hyperbolic function.