Inverse modeling of stress field of valley slope of Jinping complex structure and characteristics
|更新时间:2026-06-25
|
Inverse modeling of stress field of valley slope of Jinping complex structure and characteristics
Vol. 33, Issue S2, (2012)
作者机构:
1. 吉林大学 建设工程学院,长春,130016
2. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,成都,610059
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:TV698.1
Online First:11 December 2012,
Published:2012
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
XU Pei-hua, HUANG Run-qiu, CHEN Jian-ping, et al. Inverse modeling of stress field of valley slope of Jinping complex structure and characteristics[J]. 2012, 33(S2).
DOI:
XU Pei-hua, HUANG Run-qiu, CHEN Jian-ping, et al. Inverse modeling of stress field of valley slope of Jinping complex structure and characteristics[J]. 2012, 33(S2).DOI:
Inverse modeling of stress field of valley slope of Jinping complex structure and characteristics
The valley stress field of Jinping I stage hydropower station is regressively computed based on investigating geological conditions. The in-situ test data and the calculation results that were explored by predecessors are considered and comparatives analysed during the regression simulation process. The geological section III is served as research object; and it is meticulously generalized; then a numerical model with complex geological structure is established. At the same time
the river development history is investigated. Then the evolution processes of bank slope frontier and weathering rock belt are designed based on the river cutting speed and timespan during every river terrace. Through many regression calculations
the stress trial method is chosen. Through analyzing Jinping tectonic characteristics
in-situ geostress data and predecessor’s results
the 12 MPa and 8 MPa uniform stress are decided to apply on model boundary after many trial computations. The regression simulation results are the best one
when the uniform stresses of 12 MPa
8 MPa are applied on two vertical boundaries of the sixth river terrace model with the gravity stress field. A comparative analysis between the simulated results and the measured geostress data is carried out. It is shown that the magnitude and distribution depth of the stress concentration zone at the bottom are both fitting with a high precision between the calculation results and in-situ stress data. Through analyzing Jinping valley stress field features
it is shown that the stress distribution is not symmetric between left and right bank slopes. The stress distribution in the left bank is more complex due to the influence of fault and macular dikes tending to outward. In left bank the stress strong differentiation zone and unloading scope are both deeper than right bank.