Difference and modification of regression analysis methods to estimate shear strength parameters obtained by triaxial test

YU Dong-ming; YAO Hai-lin; WU Shao-feng

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Difference and modification of regression analysis methods to estimate shear strength parameters obtained by triaxial test

更新时间：2026-06-25

- Difference and modification of regression analysis methods to estimate shear strength parameters obtained by triaxial test
- Vol. 33, Issue 10, (2012)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,武汉,430071
  2. 广东电网公司佛山南海供电局,广东,佛山,528200
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC： TU411.7
- Online First：19 October 2012，
  
  Published：2012
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
YU Dong-ming, YAO Hai-lin, WU Shao-feng. Difference and modification of regression analysis methods to estimate shear strength parameters obtained by triaxial test[J]. 2012, 33(10).
DOI：

YU Dong-ming, YAO Hai-lin, WU Shao-feng. Difference and modification of regression analysis methods to estimate shear strength parameters obtained by triaxial test[J]. 2012, 33(10). DOI：

摘要

对岩土三轴试验数据采用两种线性回归法计算所得的抗剪强度参数c、φ值会有差别。为了揭示这两种回归方法差别的根本原因，深入最小二乘法线性回归的基本原理指出，按大小主应力回归的结果是最佳估值，而按p-q曲线回归的计算结果不可靠，为了得到统一的结果，对后者所基于的最小二乘法进行了修正；推导了修正后的回归系数计算公式，证明了修正后两种方法得到的结果相同，并用一组千枚岩三轴试验数据进行了验证。结果表明，修正后用这两种方法确定三轴试验抗剪强度参数值都将得到同样的最佳无偏估值。

Abstract

The values of shear strength parameters

c and φ

estimated by two linear regression methods from data of rock or soil triaxial test are different. To reveal the basic cause of differences between the two regression methods

the principle of linear regression based on the least square method is analyzed thoroughly. The results estimated by regressing maximum principal stress with minor principal stress are the best values

while the results obtained by regressing maximum shear stress with average normal stress are not reliable. Modification for least square method of the latter regression method is done to obtain uniform results. Formulas for calculating modified regression coefficients are deduced. It is proved that results by the two methods after modification are the same; and they are applied to calculate the shear strength parameters in triaxial tests of phyllite. The results show that to rock or soil triaxial test

the values of shear strength parameters calculated by the two methods after modification are also the same best and unbiased estimations.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

2051

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Shear strength and volume change behavior of clay-rich soil at high suctions

Direct shear tests and PFC2D numerical simulation of colluvial mixture

Three-dimensional distinct element simulation of macro triaxial compressional strength characteristics of methane hydrate through uniaxial compressional test

Research on effective elastic mechanical properties of medium rank coal

Linear optimization method for shear strength parameters of rock mass

Related Author

XU Xiao

ZHAO Cheng-gang

XUE Ya-dong

LIU Zhong-qiang

WU Jian

JIANG Ming-jing

HE Jie

FAN Tie-gang

Related Institution

Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University

College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guilin University of Technology

Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Education Ministry, Tongji University

Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongii University

Norwegian Geotechnical Institute

AI问答

⁰