Comparing three design approaches in EN1997-1 Eurocode with those in Chinese geotechnical design code
|更新时间:2026-06-25
|
Comparing three design approaches in EN1997-1 Eurocode with those in Chinese geotechnical design code
Vol. 33, Issue S2, (2012)
作者机构:
1. 武汉工程大学 环境与城市建设学院,武汉,430073
2. 中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司,武汉,430056
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:TU443
Online First:11 December 2012,
Published:2012
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LI Yuan-song, YU Shun-xin, DENG Tao. Comparing three design approaches in EN1997-1 Eurocode with those in Chinese geotechnical design code[J]. 2012, 33(S2).
DOI:
LI Yuan-song, YU Shun-xin, DENG Tao. Comparing three design approaches in EN1997-1 Eurocode with those in Chinese geotechnical design code[J]. 2012, 33(S2).DOI:
Comparing three design approaches in EN1997-1 Eurocode with those in Chinese geotechnical design code
is the first step and key problem for the enterprise to go abroad to overseas market
and to enhance the international competitiveness. On the other hand
the revision and perfection of current domestic codes must draw lessons and absorb the advanced experiences from international standards. The basic principle of the European geotechnical engineering design code[1] including the action
effect
resistance and limit state calculation inequality
taking value characteristic of partial factors and application situation for three design approaches are introduced. Taking “The code for design of building foundation”[2] for example
the comparative analysis is made to find the similarities and differences in design approaches of the Chinese and European geotechnical design codes and the problems in domestic standards. Finally
a shallow foundation design example is given to illustrate the computing errors among three kinds of design approaches of European standard and those of domestic design codes. On this basis
the suggestions for improvement of domestic design codes are put forward.