Application of strength reduction FEM to stability analysis of high fill slope in Kunming new airport

CHEN Jin-feng; SONG Er-xiang; XU Ming

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Application of strength reduction FEM to stability analysis of high fill slope in Kunming new airport

更新时间：2026-06-25

- Application of strength reduction FEM to stability analysis of high fill slope in Kunming new airport
- Vol. 32, Issue S1, (2011)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 清华大学土木工程系,北京,100084
  2. 后勤工程学院建筑设计研究院,重庆,400041
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC： TU43
- Online First：16 May 2011，
  
  Published：2011
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
CHEN Jin-feng, SONG Er-xiang, XU Ming. Application of strength reduction FEM to stability analysis of high fill slope in Kunming new airport[J]. 2011, 32(S1).
DOI：

CHEN Jin-feng, SONG Er-xiang, XU Ming. Application of strength reduction FEM to stability analysis of high fill slope in Kunming new airport[J]. 2011, 32(S1). DOI：

摘要

介绍了碎石桩、强夯置换两种工程常用的山区高填方地基的处理方式。为了解不同地基处理方式下，山区机场高填方边坡的稳定性，采用强度折减有限元法及对比研究的手段对昆明新机场79-79?工程地质剖面处边坡的稳定性进行分析，而且将强度折减有限元与简化Bishop方法的计算结果进行对比。另外，对土体强度参数未折减时，不同地基处理方式下的边坡位移及剪应变也进行比较。结果表明：用碎石桩或强夯置换处理坡脚内地基的相对软弱土层，不仅能有效提高边坡安全系数，还能大幅度减小边坡的最大剪应变与最大位移；当边坡的最危险滑移面接近圆弧形时，强度折减有限元法与简化Bishop法计算所得安全系数与最危险滑移面均接近，且强度折减有限元法计算的安全系数略偏小，偏于安全；当中风化基岩上方覆盖土层深度大于强夯置换的有效处理深度时，用碎石桩处理原地基效果更优

Abstract

Two kinds of ground treatment methods

gravel piles and dynamic replacement methods

are introduced

which are the most popular treatments at high fill foundation of airport in mountainous area. Comparative studies are carried out by the strength reduction FEM to analyze slope stability of 79-79? engineering geological profile in Kunming new airport under different ground treatments. Comparison between the outcome of stability analysis calculated by FEM and that calculated by simplified Bishop method is also implemented. Moreover

without reducing soil strength parameters

comparative studies of displacements and shear strains of the slope under different ground treatments are performed. The results show that the disposal of the relative soft foundation within slope toe with gravel piles or dynamic replacement method can not only enhance slope safety factor effectively

but also reduce maximum displacements and shear strains by leaps and bounds. Furthermore

safety factors and the most dangerous sliding surfaces calculated by the strength reduction FEM are close to that calculated by simplified Bishop method

when the most dangerous sliding surfaces are close to arc shape. And safety factors

calculated by the strength reduction FEM

are conservative as they are slightly smaller than those calculated by simplified Bishop method. Finally

gravel pile method is better than dynamic replacement method when the coating over moderately weathered bedrock is deeper than the treatment depth of dynamic replacement.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

877

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

A field experimental study of compaction piles in collapsible loess foundation

Test and application of vibro-compaction of dredging silty fine sands without additional backfill materials

Analysis of local sliding mechanism of Longdong slope reinforced with stabilizing piles

Application of finite elements with joint net to stability analysis of toppling slope

On seepage flow and stability of unsaturated soil embankment

Related Author

MI Hai-zhen

YANG Peng

HE Kai-sheng

GUO Xing-fa

LI Rong-jian

ZHENG Wen

SHAO Sheng-jun

LIU Kai

Related Institution

School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology

School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University

Nantong Port Group Co., Ltd.

Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology

The 2nd Engineering Co.Ltd of China Railway 17 Bureau Group Corporation

AI问答

⁰