Finite element analysis of underground opening model considering constitutive and structural size effects
|更新时间:2026-06-25
|
Finite element analysis of underground opening model considering constitutive and structural size effects
Vol. 33, Issue 1, (2012)
作者机构:
1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,武汉,430071
2. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,成都,610031
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:TU457
Online First:17 January 2012,
Published:2012
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
ZHANG Yu-jun, ZHANG Wei-qing. Finite element analysis of underground opening model considering constitutive and structural size effects[J]. 2012, 33(1).
DOI:
ZHANG Yu-jun, ZHANG Wei-qing. Finite element analysis of underground opening model considering constitutive and structural size effects[J]. 2012, 33(1).DOI:
Finite element analysis of underground opening model considering constitutive and structural size effects
The authors think that there exist two kinds of size effects for the stability of surrounding rock mass of an underground opening; namely they are the constitutive size effect and the structural size effect. As a tentative inquiry
the authors try to investigate the actions of the two kinds of size effects in the finite element analysis (FEA) for an underground opening model. So two cases are assumed: the first one
the mechanical properties at any point in surrounding rock mass are the negative power functions of distance between the point and the opening center; and the opening span changes from small to large
that is
the constitutive size effect and the structural size effects are considered simultaneously; the second one
the mechanical properties of surrounding rock mass are constants
but the opening span changes from small to large; that is
only the structural size effect is considered. The elastoplastic calculations under a plane-strain condition are carried out for the two cases; and the stresses
displacements and plastic zones in the surrounding rock mass are analyzed. The results show that: the displacements and plastic zones in the the surrounding rock mass are smaller; and the stresses are comparatively large
considering the constitutive size effect of the mechanical properties; but the situation of without considering the constitutive size effect is the other way round.