Analysis of variation of elastic wave velocity in rock mass under unloading condition
|更新时间:2026-06-25
|
Analysis of variation of elastic wave velocity in rock mass under unloading condition
Vol. 32, Issue 10, (2011)
作者机构:
1. 中国科学技术大学 中国科学院材料力学行为和设计重点实验室,合肥,230027
2. 中国科学技术大学 地球及空间科学系,合肥,230026
3. 浙江华东工程安全技术有限公司,杭州,310014
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:TU452
Online First:13 October 2011,
Published:2011
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
XU Song-lin, LIU Yong-gui, XI Dao-ying, et al. Analysis of variation of elastic wave velocity in rock mass under unloading condition[J]. 2011, 32(10).
DOI:
XU Song-lin, LIU Yong-gui, XI Dao-ying, et al. Analysis of variation of elastic wave velocity in rock mass under unloading condition[J]. 2011, 32(10).DOI:
Analysis of variation of elastic wave velocity in rock mass under unloading condition
The stress state and the geometrical structures in rock mass are adjusted during unloading. Since it is difficult to describe the process of stress adjustment
the geometrical structures are used in the present paper to investigate the process of rock mass unloading
and the elastic wave velocity is studied by considering the interaction of geometrical structure and elastic wave. A double-crack structure is employed to make approximate analysis of the elastic wave velocity in jointed rock mass. In the model
the analysis method of interaction within the double-crack structure is used to partly consider multiple scattering between the joints of rock mass
and the linear superposition method between double-crack structures is adopted to analyze the localization effect for defects in rocks. The influence of unloading on the rock bridge is described by the opening displacement and the opening rate of joints
and variation of elastic wave velocity of four different kinds of rocks corresponding to two dominant frequencies
25 kHz and 1 kHz
is studied under excavation unloading condition. The results show that in the process of unloading
relative acoustic velocity corresponding to 25 kHz and seismic velocity corresponding to 1 kHz are gradually decreased; however
the decreasing degree of acoustic velocity is less than that of seismic velocity. For example
acoustic velocity of highly unloaded rock mass reduces to be 80% of that of the original rock mass
and seismic wave velocity reduces to be 50% of that of the original rock mass. These conclusions are of good guidance for the inspection and evaluation of water conservancy project and railway tunneling construction