Study on prediction of ultimate settlement using finite-strain consolidation theory

DING Zhou-xiang; ZHU He-hua; GONG Xiao-nan

English Version Journal Login

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Study on prediction of ultimate settlement using finite-strain consolidation theory

更新时间：2026-06-25

- Study on prediction of ultimate settlement using finite-strain consolidation theory
- Vol. 27, Issue S2, (2006)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海,200092
  2. 浙江大学岩土工程研究所,杭州,310027
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC： TU433
- Online First：16 December 2006，
  
  Published：2006
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
DING Zhou-xiang, ZHU He-hua, GONG Xiao-nan. Study on prediction of ultimate settlement using finite-strain consolidation theory[J]. 2006, 27(S2).
DOI：

DING Zhou-xiang, ZHU He-hua, GONG Xiao-nan. Study on prediction of ultimate settlement using finite-strain consolidation theory[J]. 2006, 27(S2). DOI：

摘要

大变形理论的力学机制较为严格，但由于其固有的复杂性和非线性，目前对大小变形理论计算的沉降量差别仍存在争议。基于连续介质力学基本原理，采用土力学符号约定推导了T.L.描述的大变形固结增量有限元方程组及其总应力分析形式。结合算例，分析了材料线性化和材料几何双线性化简化算法的影响，探讨了较合适的荷载增量步长，讨论了大、小变形法计算的最终沉降量差别。结果表明，荷载增量步长对两种线性化法计算结果较为敏感；大变形法计算的沉降量偏大于小变形结果，这可能是由几何非线性问题的“拉压刚度不同”效应引起；初应力矩阵对最终沉降量有较大影响等。

Abstract

Although the mechanism of finite strain consolidation (FSC) theory is rigorous

its inherent complexity and non-linearity lead to the present controversy on the difference between foundation settlements predicted by FSC theory and by small strain (SS) theory. Based on fundamentals of continuum mechanics

the FSC incremental finite element (FE) equations with total Lagrangian (TL) description are formulated using soil mechanics sign convention; and the corresponding reduced FE equations for total stress analysis are also obtained. Through a case study

the influence of material linearization method and material geometrical bi-linearization method on the results of FSC theory is analyzed with the discussion of the appropriate length of sub-load step

and the difference between the ultimate settlements by FSC theory and SS theory are probed. The results show that the predicted settlements by linearization methods are sensitive to the length of sub-load step; the settlement by FSC theory is larger than that by SS theory

due to the effect of different stiffnesses under tensile and compressed state in geometrically nonlinearty problems; the initial stress matrix plays an important role in calculating the ultimate settlement by FSC theory

etc.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

161

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Reliability analysis of tunnel lining based on continuum model

Numerical simulation of dynamic interaction between widening embankment and balance weight retaining wall in mountain region

Study of basal bearing capacity for soil nailing walls

Investigation on finite element upper bound solution based on rigid translatory moving element

Numerical simulation of damage mechanism of abrasive water jet impaction on rock

Related Author

WU Guojun

CHEN Weizhong

LIU Doudou

TAN Xianjun

JIANG Xin

GENG Jian-yu

ZENG Cheng

QIU Yan-jun

Related Institution

Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Research Center of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Shandong University

School of Business Administration, Shandong Institute of Finance

School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University

Key Laboratory of Highway Engineering of Sichuan Province, Southwest Jiaotong University

AI问答

⁰