Partial Discharge Pattern Recognition of HVDC Cable Based on Compressive Sensing
|更新时间:2025-12-08
|
Partial Discharge Pattern Recognition of HVDC Cable Based on Compressive Sensing
Vol. 43, Issue 2, Pages: 446-452(2017)
作者机构:
1. 上海交通大学电气工程系
2. 国网浙江省电力公司舟山供电公司
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published Online:10 February 2017,
Published:2017
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
YANG Fengyuan, XU Yongpeng, ZHENG Xinlong, et al. Partial Discharge Pattern Recognition of HVDC Cable Based on Compressive Sensing[J]. 2017, 43(2): 446-452.
DOI:
YANG Fengyuan, XU Yongpeng, ZHENG Xinlong, et al. Partial Discharge Pattern Recognition of HVDC Cable Based on Compressive Sensing[J]. 2017, 43(2): 446-452.DOI:
Partial Discharge Pattern Recognition of HVDC Cable Based on Compressive Sensing
high-voltage direct current(HVDC) cable projects have been developing quickly. However
studies on online detection and pattern recognition of cable and accessories still remain in primary stage. On the basis of cross-linked polyethylene(XLPE) cable
we designed four kinds of partial discharge(PD) defect models
such as air gap inside XLPE
scratch on the surface of XLPE
creepage on the outer semi-conducting layer
and corona inside XLPE on high voltage side. The Sparse Representation Classification technique based on compressed sensing was applied to pattern recognition of PD under DC voltage. The discharge repetition rate plots were drawn as the classification samples. All the training samples composed of an over-complete dictionary and sparse representations of test samples projecting on this dictionary were used to classify based on 1-norm minimization. Three 1-norm minimization algorithms were adopted under different dimensions
including Homotopy algorithm
non-negative least squares(NNLS)
and orthogonal matching pursuit(OMP). The results reveal that the recognition rates of the three methods are approximate under lower dimension(10×10 or 15×15). The Homotopy algorithm outperforms the others in recognition rate with the increase of dimension
and achieves 92.31% as the maximum recognition rate under 20×20 dimension. NNLS takes second place while consuming more time. Comprehensive comparison shows that Homotopy algorithm has obvious advantages in recognition accuracy and arithmetic speed