Effect of Energy on Success Rate Density Distribution of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
|更新时间:2025-12-08
|
Effect of Energy on Success Rate Density Distribution of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
Vol. 43, Issue 8, Pages: 2470-2476(2017)
作者机构:
1. 温州医科大学附属第三医院瑞安市人民医院碎石中心
2. 浙江大学医学院浙江省生物电磁学重点实验室生物物理与医学工程研究组
3. 杭州师范大学医学院
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published Online:31 August 2017,
Published:2017
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LIN Youyue, BAO Jiali, CHEN Junfei, et al. Effect of Energy on Success Rate Density Distribution of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy[J]. 2017, 43(8): 2470-2476.
DOI:
LIN Youyue, BAO Jiali, CHEN Junfei, et al. Effect of Energy on Success Rate Density Distribution of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy[J]. 2017, 43(8): 2470-2476.DOI:
Effect of Energy on Success Rate Density Distribution of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
摘要
体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)是一种无创治疗泌尿系结石的医疗技术
临床上有95%以上的成功率
冲击波能量是这种医疗技术成功的关键因素。为此
阐述了冲击波的形成、传播、聚焦
冲击波发生器的电场能量和碎石原理等
然后从ESWL成功率密度分布中分析冲击波最佳能量。ESWL病例入选条件是门诊输尿管结石患者
年龄在18
8
3岁之间
左、右单侧或双侧输尿管具有放射影像学结石特征
ESWL数据完整
并且输尿管结石ESWL成功者。通过建立能量的ESWL成功率密度分布函数
得到其数学期望和均方差
从而获得ESWL成功的最佳能量。研究结果表明:从入选的5 747例ESWL病例中
获得ESWL成功率密度分布函数的数学期望为535 m J/mm
2
均方差为157 m J/mm
2
最佳能量在418
7
32 m J/mm
2
范围内;该最佳能量可以通过能级来确定
能级一般分为Ⅰ级(约10 m J/mm
2
)、Ⅱ级(20
4
0 m J/mm
2
)、Ⅲ级(30
3
00 m J/mm
2
)、Ⅳ级(400
1
200 m J/mm
2
);可以根据结石的大小和密度来选择能级。该结果有助于临床医师根据实际情况选择能量
以提高ESWL成功率。
Abstract
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy(ESWL) is a non-invasive method for the treatment of urinary calculi
with more than 95% success rate in clinic. The shock wave energy is a key factor in the success of this method. Therefore
it is introduced the forming
propagation and focusing of shockwave
electric field energy of shockwave generator
and lithotripsy principle. Then the optimal energy of the shockwave is analyzed from the success rate density distribution of ESWL. The subjects wear patients aged 18
8
3 with ureteral stone in
the radiographic imaging characteristics in left or/and right and complete data of ESWL from outpatient. And they have been treated successful by ESWL. The mathematical expectation and variance are got by ESWL success rate density distribution function
and obtain the best energy range of ESWL. The results show the mathematical expectation is 535 m J/mm
2
and the mean variance is 157 m J/mm
2
from 5 747 cases. The optimum energy is 418
7
32 m J/mm
2
. However
the energy is determined by the focus energy level. Generally
Ⅰ level of the focus energy was about 10 m J/mm
2
Ⅱ level 20
4
0 m J/mm
2
Ⅲ level 30
3
00 m J/mm
2
Ⅳlevel 400
1
200 m J/mm
2
. The energy level can choose according to the size and density of the stones. This conclusion helps clinicians to select the energy of ESWL based on the actual stone for obtain the best ESWL successful.