Discussion on Steenbeck Mininum Voltage Principle for Arc Discharge Plasmas
|更新时间:2025-12-08
|
Discussion on Steenbeck Mininum Voltage Principle for Arc Discharge Plasmas
Vol. 44, Issue 3, Pages: 926-931(2018)
作者机构:
1. 中国科学技术大学热科学和能源工程系
2. 武汉第二船舶设计研究所热能动力技术重点实验室
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published Online:30 March 2018,
Published:2018
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
LIAO Mengran, WU Hanfeng, WANG Cheng, et al. Discussion on Steenbeck Mininum Voltage Principle for Arc Discharge Plasmas[J]. 2018, 44(3): 926-931.
DOI:
LIAO Mengran, WU Hanfeng, WANG Cheng, et al. Discussion on Steenbeck Mininum Voltage Principle for Arc Discharge Plasmas[J]. 2018, 44(3): 926-931.DOI:
Discussion on Steenbeck Mininum Voltage Principle for Arc Discharge Plasmas
摘要
Steenbeck最小弧压原理在电弧等离子体研究中被广泛使用
然而历史上关于该假设仍然有不少争议。为了澄清最小弧压原理中的矛盾及其合适的使用条件
重新梳理了其发展历史并做了进一步分析讨论。分析结果表明
根据Steenbeck电弧通道模型和最小弧压原理
将得出并不真实的弧柱半径。其次
比较了多种电弧理论方法与能量方程(Elenbaas-Heller方程)之间的联系
证明Steenbeck最小弧压原理的引入是没有必要的。最后
总结了关于Steenbeck最小弧压原理和最小熵产原理、电磁学方程之间的联系和差别
表明Steenbeck最小弧压原理与经典理论之间的矛盾和冲突。
Abstract
The Steenbeck minimum voltage(SMP) is widely used in the study of arc discharge plasmas
however
its validity is still in dispute in history. Consequently
we reexamined and discussed the history of SMP
and analyzed the true mathematical and physical meanings of the SMP in detail. Results show that the original method combined with SMP and Steenbeck’s channel model(SCM) tends to give a wrong estimation of the arc channel radius. On the other hand
analyses show that the SMP is redundant in the characterization of arc discharge plasma
after comparing it with other model or method on the solution of energy equation(also called the Elenbaas-Heller equation). In the end
the relation and difference between SMP and the classical thermodynamic-electromagnetic theory
including the minimum entropy production principle(MEP) and so on