Dielectric Recovery Process of Multiple Re-ignition Phenomena After Small Inductive Current Interruption in Vacuum
|更新时间:2025-12-08
|
Dielectric Recovery Process of Multiple Re-ignition Phenomena After Small Inductive Current Interruption in Vacuum
Vol. 44, Issue 6, Pages: 2019-2026(2018)
作者机构:
1. 西安科技大学电气与控制工程学院
2. 西安交通大学电气工程学院
3. 西门子电气传动设备有限公司
4. 西安交通大学电力设备与电气绝缘国家重点实验室
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published Online:10 July 2018,
Published:2018
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
WANG Feng, WANG Zhongyi, HAO Mengmeng, et al. Dielectric Recovery Process of Multiple Re-ignition Phenomena After Small Inductive Current Interruption in Vacuum[J]. 2018, 44(6): 2019-2026.
DOI:
WANG Feng, WANG Zhongyi, HAO Mengmeng, et al. Dielectric Recovery Process of Multiple Re-ignition Phenomena After Small Inductive Current Interruption in Vacuum[J]. 2018, 44(6): 2019-2026.DOI:
Dielectric Recovery Process of Multiple Re-ignition Phenomena After Small Inductive Current Interruption in Vacuum
Multiple re-ignition overvoltage is determined by dielectric recovery strength after interruption of small inductive currents in vacuum. We established a micro-physical model for small inductive current interruption in vacuum
with which the influence of load parameters on the re-ignitions can be determined
so as to reveal the sheath development process after interruption of small inductive current in vacuum. The following micro-parameters were determined
including the ion density
ion speed
development of electric field
and potential distribution under various TRVs. A critical electric field strength at the cathode was chosen as a criterion for the re-ignition. The simulation results show the following influence of load parameters on the re-ignitions of small current inductive current interruption in vacuum. A higher load capacitance or a higher load inductance will decrease the sheath development speed and the maximum field strength
which decreases the overvoltage and the risk of re-ignition. The sheath speed and the maximum field strength does not change with the increase of the equivalent resistance
but the load current decreases with the increase of the equivalent resistance. A lower load current reduces sheath velocity
which results in a lower maximum electric field strength. Therefore