Optimal Extraction of Partial Discharge Fingerprint Parameters of HVDC XLPE Cable
|更新时间:2025-12-08
|
Optimal Extraction of Partial Discharge Fingerprint Parameters of HVDC XLPE Cable
Vol. 45, Issue 9, Pages: 2806-2817(2019)
作者机构:
1. 武汉大学电气与自动化学院
2. 国网甘肃省电力公司电力科学研究院
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published Online:30 September 2019,
Published:2019
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
TANG Ju, SONG Wenbin, PAN Cheng, et al. Optimal Extraction of Partial Discharge Fingerprint Parameters of HVDC XLPE Cable[J]. 2019, 45(9): 2806-2817.
DOI:
TANG Ju, SONG Wenbin, PAN Cheng, et al. Optimal Extraction of Partial Discharge Fingerprint Parameters of HVDC XLPE Cable[J]. 2019, 45(9): 2806-2817.DOI:
Optimal Extraction of Partial Discharge Fingerprint Parameters of HVDC XLPE Cable
To study an optimized extraction method of partial discharge(PD) fingerprint parameters under DC voltage
XLPE cable was used to construct 3 kinds of insulation defects
including inner semi-conductive layer breakage
internal air cavity defect
and insulation surface scratch defect. The PD characteristics of the 3 defects were tested under DC voltage with different amplitudes and polarities. Moreover
the traditional fingerprint extraction method was compared with the GA-BP algorithm-based characteristic parameters extraction method to find their effects on defect type identification. The research results indicate that the PD repetition rate and average discharge amount under positive voltage are higher than those under negative voltage with inner semi-conductive layer breakage. With internal air cavity defect
PD repetition rate under negative voltage is higher than that under positive voltage
while average discharge amounts are basically equal. With insulation surface scratch defect
the PD repetition rate and average discharge amount vary within a large range
and the PD discharge repetition rate is significantly higher than that of other two kinds of defects. The fingerprint parameter of an insulation defect obtained by the traditional fingerprint extraction method is susceptible to the influence of voltage amplitude and polarity. The GA-BP algorithm can exclude this effect after extracting fingerprint parameters. We use traditional fingerprint and optimized fingerprint to identify fault types
with the same defect under identical voltage amplitude and polarity
the recognition rates of them are higher than 97%; with the same defect under various voltage amplitudes and polarities
the recognition rate of traditional fingerprint drops to 87%
the recognition rate of optimized fingerprint is still above 97%.