Calculation and Testing Research on Current Rating Capacity of XLPE Insulated HVDC Cable with Different Metallic Screen Type
|更新时间:2025-12-08
|
Calculation and Testing Research on Current Rating Capacity of XLPE Insulated HVDC Cable with Different Metallic Screen Type
Vol. 47, Issue 6, Pages: 2117-2123(2021)
作者机构:
1. 上海交通大学电子信息与电气工程学院电气工程系
2. 电力传输与功率变换控制教育部重点实验室
3. 中天科技海缆有限公司
4. 上海国缆检测中心有限公司
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published Online:30 June 2021,
Published:2021
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
ZHANG Hongliang, YIN Yi, XIE Shuhong, et al. Calculation and Testing Research on Current Rating Capacity of XLPE Insulated HVDC Cable with Different Metallic Screen Type[J]. 2021, 47(6): 2117-2123.
DOI:
ZHANG Hongliang, YIN Yi, XIE Shuhong, et al. Calculation and Testing Research on Current Rating Capacity of XLPE Insulated HVDC Cable with Different Metallic Screen Type[J]. 2021, 47(6): 2117-2123.DOI:
Calculation and Testing Research on Current Rating Capacity of XLPE Insulated HVDC Cable with Different Metallic Screen Type
To clarify the influence of different metallic screen types on the current rating capacity of HVDC cables
and to compare the accuracy of calculation results of thermal analysis and finite element simulation
we selected ±525 kV XLPE insulated cables with copper conductor cross-section of 3 000 mm
2
as examples to perform the experiments. The current rating capacity of HVDC cable with copper wires and corrugated aluminium sheath were calculated based on thermal analysis and finite element simulation respectively
then the results were verified by DC current
loading tests. The calculation results show that the current rating capacity of HVDC cable with copper wires is greater than that with corrugated aluminium sheath under the same condition. But the results based on two calculation methods above are both smaller than those of loading tests
and also obvious deviations exist. Based on thermal analysis
the current rating capacity of ±525 kV cable with copper wires is 2 842 A under 28 ℃ in air
which decreases by a 7.5% compared to the result of finite element simulation and decreases by 15.8% compared to the result of DC current loading tests
respectively. Under the same condition
the current rating capacity of ±525 k V cable with corrugated aluminium sheath is 2 836 A based on thermal analysis
which decreases by 5.3% compared to the result of finite element simulation and decreases by 8.6% compared to the result of DC current loading test
respectively. The reason is that
in the thermal analysis
only the influence of thermal resistance in the process of cable heat conduction is taken into consideration
but the increase of heat radiation of external air convection to current rating capacity can not be calculated
and also the effect of air on heat transfer inside the cable structure is not taken into consideration. Due to the ability to recognize thermal radiation effects in addition to heat conduction
the calculation results based on finite element simulation are more close to test results. However
the finite element simulation model can not represent the air-gap and corrugated aluminium sheath of cable accurately
and the heat dissipation of cable caused by airflow in current loading tests can not be simulated accurately by finite element simulation.