高克利, 杨圆, 颜湘莲, 季严松, 高凯, 王劭菁. 基于双波段红外成像的六氟化硫气体泄漏定量检测技术研究[J]. 电网技术, 2025, 49(1): 167-176. DOI: 10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2024.0190
引用本文: 高克利, 杨圆, 颜湘莲, 季严松, 高凯, 王劭菁. 基于双波段红外成像的六氟化硫气体泄漏定量检测技术研究[J]. 电网技术, 2025, 49(1): 167-176. DOI: 10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2024.0190
GAO Keli, YANG Yuan, YAN Xianglian, JI Yansong, GAO Kai, WANG Shaojing. Research on Quantitative Detection Technology of SF6 Gas Leakage Based on Dual-band Infrared Imaging[J]. Power System Technology, 2025, 49(1): 167-176. DOI: 10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2024.0190
Citation: GAO Keli, YANG Yuan, YAN Xianglian, JI Yansong, GAO Kai, WANG Shaojing. Research on Quantitative Detection Technology of SF6 Gas Leakage Based on Dual-band Infrared Imaging[J]. Power System Technology, 2025, 49(1): 167-176. DOI: 10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2024.0190

基于双波段红外成像的六氟化硫气体泄漏定量检测技术研究

Research on Quantitative Detection Technology of SF6 Gas Leakage Based on Dual-band Infrared Imaging

  • 摘要: 红外热成像技术广泛应用于SF6气体泄漏检测,具有非接触、直观性强、响应快速等优点,然而传统红外成像式检漏仪无法进行气体泄漏量定量测量。为实现非接触式红外泄漏成像的定量检测,该研究提出了一种基于双波段红外成像的气体泄漏检测方法,利用改进ViBe算法进行泄漏气体云团的定位,通过气体吸收波段和非吸收波段间的双波段差分分析,量化给出SF6气体泄漏量。研究结果表明,差分检测能够较好地消除气体泄漏处背景辐射影响,检测结果与真值的决定系数达到0.8,误差均值为14.3%,能够实现对30ppm⋅m泄漏量的定量检测。相对于传统的SF6气体红外成像泄漏检测方法,双波段红外差分成像方法在进行泄漏位置检测的同时,实现了泄漏量的量化检测。

     

    Abstract: The infrared thermal imaging technology is widely used in SF6 gas leakage detection, with advantages such as non-contact, strong intuitiveness, and fast response. However, traditional infrared imaging leak detectors cannot provide quantitative measurements. A gas leakage detection method based on dual-band infrared imaging is proposed in this study to realize the quantitative detection of non-contact infrared leakage imaging. The improved VIBE algorithm is used to locate the leakage gas cloud. Through the dual-band differential analysis between the gas absorption band and the non-absorption band, the SF6 gas leakage is quantified. The results show that the differential detection can better eliminate the influence of background radiation at the gas leakage, the coefficient of determination between the result and the true value reaches 0.8, and the average error is 14.3%, which can realize the quantitative detection of 30ppm⋅m leakage. Compared with the traditional SF6 gas infrared imaging leakage detection method, the dual-band infrared differential imaging method realizes the quantitative leakage detection while detecting the leakage position.

     

/

返回文章
返回