周全, 冯冬涵, 徐长宝, 冯成, 孙弢, 丁藤. 负荷侧碳排放责任直接分摊方法的比较研究[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2015, 39(17): 153-159.
引用本文: 周全, 冯冬涵, 徐长宝, 冯成, 孙弢, 丁藤. 负荷侧碳排放责任直接分摊方法的比较研究[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2015, 39(17): 153-159.
ZHOU Quan, FENG Donghan, XU Changbao, FENG Cheng, SUN Tao, DING Teng. Methods for Allocating Carbon Obligation in Demand Side:a Comparative Study[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2015, 39(17): 153-159.
Citation: ZHOU Quan, FENG Donghan, XU Changbao, FENG Cheng, SUN Tao, DING Teng. Methods for Allocating Carbon Obligation in Demand Side:a Comparative Study[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2015, 39(17): 153-159.

负荷侧碳排放责任直接分摊方法的比较研究

Methods for Allocating Carbon Obligation in Demand Side:a Comparative Study

  • 摘要: 为了电力系统碳排放责任分摊机制的有效性和透明性,可以考虑从基于电力消费的角度出发在负荷侧直接进行碳排放责任分摊。由于负荷成员在碳排放责任分摊问题上的相互联系,该分摊问题可从合作博弈的角度出发,应用经典的解的概念如Shapley值和广义核仁进行求解。结合该问题的实际特点,分别阐述了基于Shapley值、广义核仁、节点碳迹强度和节点边际碳强度的四种分摊方法的基本原理和计算方法,并总结了相关公理作为衡量标准来对比分析这四种方法。其中,基于Shapley值的分摊方法更能综合评估负荷的位置、负荷成员间的相互影响等相关因素的作用,从而准确地反映出各个负荷成员对于全系统碳排放的实际贡献。最后采用一个PJM-5节点系统算例验证该分摊方法的公平性、合理性和可行性。

     

    Abstract: For transparency and effectiveness of allocation mechanism,the carbon emission obligation of the whole system can be directly allocated at demand side from a consumption-based perspective.The problem can be treated as a cooperative game due to the interactions between the loads with respect to the system-wide carbon emission,and the classic solution concepts such as Shapley value and prenucleolus can be applied to address the problem.By combining the characteristics of the problem,four allocation methods based on the Shapley value,prenucleolus,footprint carbon intensity and marginal carbon intensity,respectively,are demonstrated.Some axioms are summarized and used as fundamental criteria to judge these allocation methods.Comparatively,the Shapley value based method can better estimate the locational factors of loads and their interactions,thereby reflecting the actual contribution of each load to the system-wide carbon emission.It has a better performance than other methods in terms of fairness,reasonableness and feasibility,as verified on a PJM-5-bus system.

     

/

返回文章
返回