魏晗, 朱法华, 段玖祥, 李军状, 唐仲恺, 王新培, 刘广祥. 复杂环境下DOAS便携式烟气分析仪稳定性研究[J]. 电力科技与环保, 2022, 38(4): 326-332.
引用本文: 魏晗, 朱法华, 段玖祥, 李军状, 唐仲恺, 王新培, 刘广祥. 复杂环境下DOAS便携式烟气分析仪稳定性研究[J]. 电力科技与环保, 2022, 38(4): 326-332.
WEI Han, ZHU Fahua, DUAN Jiuxiang, LI Junzhuang, TANG Zhongkai, WANG Xinpei, LIU Guangxiang. Research on measurement stability of DOAS portable flue gas analyzer in complex test environment[J]. Electric Power Technology and Environmental Protection, 2022, 38(4): 326-332.
Citation: WEI Han, ZHU Fahua, DUAN Jiuxiang, LI Junzhuang, TANG Zhongkai, WANG Xinpei, LIU Guangxiang. Research on measurement stability of DOAS portable flue gas analyzer in complex test environment[J]. Electric Power Technology and Environmental Protection, 2022, 38(4): 326-332.

复杂环境下DOAS便携式烟气分析仪稳定性研究

Research on measurement stability of DOAS portable flue gas analyzer in complex test environment

  • 摘要: 为考察各种复杂测试环境对便携式烟气分析仪测量低浓度SO2和NO稳定性的表现,开展了SO2和NO的9种浓度测量准确度实验,同时设计了包括高低温、不同湿度和外部振动等因素组合而成的9种测试环境,进行SO2和NO测量稳定性对比,分析影响便携式烟气分析仪稳定性的因素。实验结果表明:DOAS便携式烟气分析仪对低浓度SO2和NO测量准确度相对较低,测量相对误差在±5%以上,测量准确度随SO2和NO标气浓度升高而有所提高,测量相对误差可降至±2%以下。低温和高温设备贮存环境均对75mg/m3 SO2量程浓度测量的稳定性产生不利影响,测量绝对误差分别为2.84mg/m3和2.64mg/m3。相较于SO2测量,DOAS便携式烟气分析仪在测量NO过程中可以更好地适应复杂测试环境。低浓度SO2和NO的测量稳定性在多种测试环境下均相对较差,且外部振动环境条件的影响最大,测量示值误差分别为2.8%和1.3%。DOAS便携式烟气分析仪针对复杂测试现场环境下准确稳定测量低浓度SO2和NO污染物的性能仍有提升空间。

     

    Abstract: In order to investigate the influence of various complex test environments on the measurement stability of portable flue gas analyzers for low concentrations of SO2 and NO, measurement accuracy experiments of SO2 and NO in 9 kinds of concentrations were carried out. 9 test environments, including high and low temperature, different humidity and external vibration, were designed to test the measurement stability of SO2 and NO. The factors affecting the measurement stability of the portable flue gas analyzer were analyzed. The results showed that the measurement accuracy of low-concentration SO2 and NO based on the DOAS portable flue gas analyzer was relatively low, and the relative measurement error was more than ±5%. The measurement accuracy increased with the rise of SO2 and NO standard gas concentration, which could be reduced to less than ±2%. Both low and high temperature storage environment could significantly-adversely affect the measurement stability of the 75mg/m~3 SO2, and the absolute errors were 2.84mg/m~3 and 2.64mg/m~3, respectively. Compared with SO2 measurement, DOAS portable flue gas analyzer could better adapt to complex test environment during NO measurement. The measurement stability of low-concentration SO2 and NO was relatively inferior in various test environments, and the external vibration environment had the greatest influence on the measurement indication errors, which were 2.8% and 1.3%, respectively. The performance of DOAS portable flue gas analyzer for accurate and stable measurement of low-concentration SO2 and NO pollutants in complex environment still needs to be further improved.

     

/

返回文章
返回