吴朝峰, 王峰, 王寅, 唐勇. 凸榫及锚杆式基础对悬臂式挡土墙结构优化分析[J]. 电力勘测设计, 2023, (S2): 27-32. DOI: 10.13500/j.dlkcsj.issn1671-9913.2023.S2.006
引用本文: 吴朝峰, 王峰, 王寅, 唐勇. 凸榫及锚杆式基础对悬臂式挡土墙结构优化分析[J]. 电力勘测设计, 2023, (S2): 27-32. DOI: 10.13500/j.dlkcsj.issn1671-9913.2023.S2.006
WU Chao-feng, WANG Feng, WANG Yin, TANG Yong. Optimal Analysis of Tenon and Anchor Rod Foundation to Cantilever-type Retaining Wall Structure[J]. Electric Power Survey & Design, 2023, (S2): 27-32. DOI: 10.13500/j.dlkcsj.issn1671-9913.2023.S2.006
Citation: WU Chao-feng, WANG Feng, WANG Yin, TANG Yong. Optimal Analysis of Tenon and Anchor Rod Foundation to Cantilever-type Retaining Wall Structure[J]. Electric Power Survey & Design, 2023, (S2): 27-32. DOI: 10.13500/j.dlkcsj.issn1671-9913.2023.S2.006

凸榫及锚杆式基础对悬臂式挡土墙结构优化分析

Optimal Analysis of Tenon and Anchor Rod Foundation to Cantilever-type Retaining Wall Structure

  • 摘要: 在山区填方挡土墙支护设计中,挡土墙基础的宽度对基础开挖工程的工程量及施工难度影响较大。通过对悬臂式挡土墙稳定性计算公式的研究,结合挡土墙计算软件,在不同挡墙高度下进行普通悬臂式挡土墙与采用凸榫、锚杆式基础悬臂式挡土墙的最小基础宽度及高宽比的对比分析。研究表明,采用凸榫及锚杆式基础的结构优化方式能使悬臂式挡土墙在较小的基础宽度下维持稳定;随着挡墙高度的增加,凸榫及锚杆式基础的结构优化方式对挡土墙基础宽度的优化更明显,凸榫优化量为1.9%~14.7%,凸榫+锚杆式基础优化量为19.4%~38.9%;结构优化后,悬臂式挡土墙在不同高度下的高宽比变化不大,凸榫为2.9,凸榫+锚杆式基础为3.5。凸榫+锚杆式基础悬臂式挡土墙在岩土体性质较好的山区填方支护中更具优势。

     

    Abstract: In the design of retaining wall support for filling in mountainous areas, the width of the foundation of the retaining wall has a greater impact on the amount of work and the difficulty of construction of the foundation excavation project.Through the study of the stability calculation formula of the cantilever-type retaining wall, combined with the retaining wall calculation software,comparative analysis of the minimum foundation width and aspect ratio of ordinary cantilever-type retaining wall and tenon foundation cantilever-type retaining wall under different retaining wall heights.Studies have shown that the use of tenon and anchor rod foundation structural optimization methods can make cantilevertype retaining walls remain stable under a smaller foundation width; as the height of the retaining wall increases, the structural optimization method of tenon and anchor rod foundation has more obvious optimization of the width of the retaining wall foundation, tenon optimization amount is 1.9% ~ 14.7%, tenon + anchor rod foundation optimization amount is 19.4% ~ 38.9%; after structural optimization, the aspect ratio of the cantilever-type retaining wall at different heights does not change much, the tenon is 2.9, and the tenon + anchor rod foundation is 3.5.Tenon + anchor rod foundation cantilever-type retaining wall has more advantages in mountain fill support with good rock and soil properties.

     

/

返回文章
返回